CFD ANALYSIS OF THE HEAD LOSS ON A T45-R TESLA VALVE

IF 0.1 Q4 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
C. Cardona, F. Hazzi, C. Pairetti, C. Venier
{"title":"CFD ANALYSIS OF THE HEAD LOSS ON A T45-R TESLA VALVE","authors":"C. Cardona, F. Hazzi, C. Pairetti, C. Venier","doi":"10.31527/analesafa.2022.fluidos.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tesla valve is a check valve without moving parts. Its operation depends strongly on the flow rate. This conduit develops asymmetric head losses due to its geometric design, behaving like a hydraulic diode with a certain degree of efficiency. In the direct flow direction, the pressure drop is relatively low, while in the reverse direction the hydraulic resistance is higher. In the present work, we develop a numerical model, based on Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD), to study the normalized Tesla valve T45-R. We simulate the incompressible laminar flow in this device. First, we analyze the precision of the model with a mesh convergence analysis. Subsequently, we compared the numerical prediction of head loss with experimental data for low Reynolds numbers, obtaining good agreement. We observe differences of less than 15 % for the forward direction and less than 6 % for the reverse direction. The diodicity prediction of the CFD differs from the experimental data below 5 %. The results obtained from the loss coefficient K differ from the experimental data by less than 14 %. Afterwards, we compared the CFD results with 0D models, available in the literature, observing a good agreement for a wider Reynolds number range. As a result of this study, we have a numerical design tool for this type of device, particularly applied in the field of microfluidics, having verified its precision in a wide operating range.","PeriodicalId":41478,"journal":{"name":"Anales AFA","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales AFA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31527/analesafa.2022.fluidos.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Tesla valve is a check valve without moving parts. Its operation depends strongly on the flow rate. This conduit develops asymmetric head losses due to its geometric design, behaving like a hydraulic diode with a certain degree of efficiency. In the direct flow direction, the pressure drop is relatively low, while in the reverse direction the hydraulic resistance is higher. In the present work, we develop a numerical model, based on Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD), to study the normalized Tesla valve T45-R. We simulate the incompressible laminar flow in this device. First, we analyze the precision of the model with a mesh convergence analysis. Subsequently, we compared the numerical prediction of head loss with experimental data for low Reynolds numbers, obtaining good agreement. We observe differences of less than 15 % for the forward direction and less than 6 % for the reverse direction. The diodicity prediction of the CFD differs from the experimental data below 5 %. The results obtained from the loss coefficient K differ from the experimental data by less than 14 %. Afterwards, we compared the CFD results with 0D models, available in the literature, observing a good agreement for a wider Reynolds number range. As a result of this study, we have a numerical design tool for this type of device, particularly applied in the field of microfluidics, having verified its precision in a wide operating range.
t45-r型特斯拉阀水头损失CFD分析
特斯拉阀门是一个没有活动部件的止回阀。它的运行在很大程度上取决于流量。由于其几何设计,这种导管产生了不对称的水头损失,表现得像一个具有一定效率的液压二极管。在顺流方向上,压降相对较小,而在反流方向上,水力阻力较大。在本工作中,我们建立了一个基于计算流体动力学(CFD)的数值模型来研究归一化特斯拉阀T45-R。我们在这个装置中模拟了不可压缩层流。首先,我们用网格收敛分析来分析模型的精度。随后,我们将低雷诺数下的水头损失数值预测与实验数据进行了比较,得到了很好的一致性。我们观察到,正方向的差异小于15%,反方向的差异小于6%。CFD的二度预测值与实验数据的差异小于5%。由损失系数K计算得到的结果与实验数据相差不到14%。随后,我们将CFD结果与文献中可用的0D模型进行了比较,观察到在更宽的雷诺数范围内有很好的一致性。通过这项研究,我们有了一个针对这类装置的数值设计工具,特别是在微流体领域的应用,并在广泛的工作范围内验证了它的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anales AFA
Anales AFA PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信