News from the GGOS DOI Working Group

K. Elger
{"title":"News from the GGOS DOI Working Group","authors":"K. Elger","doi":"10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-15081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data publications with digital object identifiers (DOI) are best practice for FAIR sharing data. Originally developed with the purpose of providing permanent access to (static) datasets described in scholarly literature, DOI today are more and more assigned to dynamic data. These DOIs are providing a citable and traceable reference of various types of sources (data, software, samples, equipment) and means of rewarding the originators and institutions. As a result of international groups, like the Coalition on Publishing Data in the Earth, Space and Environmental Sciences (COPDESS) and the Enabling FAIR Data project, data with assigned DOIs are fully citable in scholarly literature and many journals require the data underlying a publication to be available &#8211; even before accepting an article. Initial metrics for data citation allows data providers to demonstrate the value of the data collected by institutes and individual scientists.</p><p>This is especially relevant for the geodesy, because, geodesy researchers are often much more involved in operational aspects and data provision than researchers in other fields might be. Therefore, compared to other scientific disciplines, geodesy researchers appear to be producing less &#8220;countable scientific&#8221; output. Consequently, geodesy data and equipment require a structured and well-documented mechanism which will enable citability, scientific recognition and reward that can be provided by assigning DOI to data and data products.</p><p>To address these challenges and to identify opportunities for improved coordination and advocacy within the geodetic community, the International Association of Geodesy&#8217;s (IAG) Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) has established a Working Group on &#8220;Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for Geodetic Data Sets&#8221; in 2019. This Working Group is designated to establish best practices and advocate for the consistent implementation of DOIs across all IAG Services and in the greater geodetic community.</p><p>The main objectives and activities of this working group are:</p><ul><li>(1) to identify what the community needs from consistent usage of DOIs for data in terms of being able to discover data, permanently cite data, and acknowledge the data providers</li>\n<li>(2) to develop recommendations for DOI minting strategies for different geodetic data types and granularity across IAG Services (static, dynamic, observational data, data products, combination products, networks)</li>\n<li>(3) to develop recommendations for a consistent method for data citation across all IAG Services, to support data providers, and to provide quantitative support detailing the use of geodetic datasets and other resources.</li>\n<li>(4) to develop recommendations for connecting metadata standards for data discovery (e.g. DataCite, ISO19115) with community metadata standards (GeodesyML, Station Logs)</li>\n</ul><p>This presentation will provide an update on recent topics and first recommendations from the GGOS DOI Working Group.</p>","PeriodicalId":22413,"journal":{"name":"The EGU General Assembly","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EGU General Assembly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-15081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Data publications with digital object identifiers (DOI) are best practice for FAIR sharing data. Originally developed with the purpose of providing permanent access to (static) datasets described in scholarly literature, DOI today are more and more assigned to dynamic data. These DOIs are providing a citable and traceable reference of various types of sources (data, software, samples, equipment) and means of rewarding the originators and institutions. As a result of international groups, like the Coalition on Publishing Data in the Earth, Space and Environmental Sciences (COPDESS) and the Enabling FAIR Data project, data with assigned DOIs are fully citable in scholarly literature and many journals require the data underlying a publication to be available – even before accepting an article. Initial metrics for data citation allows data providers to demonstrate the value of the data collected by institutes and individual scientists.

This is especially relevant for the geodesy, because, geodesy researchers are often much more involved in operational aspects and data provision than researchers in other fields might be. Therefore, compared to other scientific disciplines, geodesy researchers appear to be producing less “countable scientific” output. Consequently, geodesy data and equipment require a structured and well-documented mechanism which will enable citability, scientific recognition and reward that can be provided by assigning DOI to data and data products.

To address these challenges and to identify opportunities for improved coordination and advocacy within the geodetic community, the International Association of Geodesy’s (IAG) Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) has established a Working Group on “Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for Geodetic Data Sets” in 2019. This Working Group is designated to establish best practices and advocate for the consistent implementation of DOIs across all IAG Services and in the greater geodetic community.

The main objectives and activities of this working group are:

  • (1) to identify what the community needs from consistent usage of DOIs for data in terms of being able to discover data, permanently cite data, and acknowledge the data providers
  • (2) to develop recommendations for DOI minting strategies for different geodetic data types and granularity across IAG Services (static, dynamic, observational data, data products, combination products, networks)
  • (3) to develop recommendations for a consistent method for data citation across all IAG Services, to support data providers, and to provide quantitative support detailing the use of geodetic datasets and other resources.
  • (4) to develop recommendations for connecting metadata standards for data discovery (e.g. DataCite, ISO19115) with community metadata standards (GeodesyML, Station Logs)

This presentation will provide an update on recent topics and first recommendations from the GGOS DOI Working Group.

来自GGOS DOI工作组的新闻
带有数字对象标识符(DOI)的数据发布是FAIR共享数据的最佳实践。DOI最初是为了提供对学术文献中描述的(静态)数据集的永久访问而开发的,如今,DOI越来越多地被分配给动态数据。这些doi提供了各种来源(数据、软件、样本、设备)的可引用和可追溯的参考资料,以及奖励发起者和机构的手段。由于国际团体,如地球、空间和环境科学数据出版联盟(COPDESS)和促进公平数据项目,具有指定doi的数据在学术文献中是完全可引用的,许多期刊要求提供出版物的基础数据–甚至在接受一篇文章之前。数据引用的初始度量允许数据提供者展示由研究所和个别科学家收集的数据的价值。这与大地测量学尤其相关,因为大地测量学研究人员通常比其他领域的研究人员更多地参与操作方面和数据提供。因此,与其他科学学科相比,大地测量学研究人员似乎产生了更少的科学成果。输出。因此,大地测量数据和设备需要一个结构化的、记录良好的机制,通过为数据和数据产品分配DOI,实现可引用性、科学认可和奖励。为了应对这些挑战并确定在大地测量界改进协调和宣传的机会,国际大地测量协会(IAG)全球大地测量观测系统(GGOS)成立了一个大地测量数据集数字目标标识符(DOIs)工作组。在2019年。该工作组的任务是建立最佳做法,并倡导在所有IAG服务部门和更大的大地测量界一致实施doi。该工作组的主要目标和活动是:(1)确定社区需要从数据DOI的一致使用中获得什么,以便能够发现数据、永久引用数据和确认数据提供者(2)为跨IAG服务(静态、动态、观测数据、数据产品、组合产品)的不同大地测量数据类型和粒度的DOI生成策略提出建议。(3)为所有IAG服务的数据引用提供一致的方法建议,为数据提供者提供支持,并为详细说明大地测量数据集和其他资源的使用提供定量支持。(4)为将数据发现的元数据标准(例如DataCite、ISO19115)与社区元数据标准(GeodesyML、GeodesyML、GeodesyML、GeodesyML、GeodesyML、GeodesyML、GeodesyML、GeodesyML、GeodesyML等)连接起来提出建议。站点日志)本报告将提供GGOS DOI工作组的最新主题和初步建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信