In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate molar crowns with different occlusal thickness

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
R. Sorrentino, Y. Nagasawa, M. Infelise, G. Bonadeo, M. Ferrari
{"title":"In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate molar crowns with different occlusal thickness","authors":"R. Sorrentino, Y. Nagasawa, M. Infelise, G. Bonadeo, M. Ferrari","doi":"10.23805/JO.2018.10.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with different occlusal thickness.  \nMaterials and methods: Thirty CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with different occlusal thickness were randomly distributed into 3 experimental groups: 0.5 mm (group 1), 1.0 mm (group 2) and 1.5 mm (group 3). The restorations were cemented onto human molars with a self-adhesive resin cement. The specimens were loaded until fracture; the fracture resistance and mode of failure were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed with the one-way ANOVA followed by the Fisher’s Exact test with Bonferroni’s correction (p=0.05). \nResults: The fracture resistance values of all the specimens exceeded the maximum physiological occlusal loads in molar regions. The highest fracture resistance was noticed in 1.0 mm-thick crowns. Ultrathin restorations (group 1) proved to be statistically less resistant to fracture than those of the other experimental groups (p<0.05). The crowns were mainly interested by unrestorable fractures. \nConclusions: The occlusal thickness of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns influences either the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of the restorations; the occlusal thickness of such restorations can be reduced up to a lower bound of 1.0 mm in order to keep sufficient strength to withstand occlusal loads; CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns showed sufficient fracture resistance to be used in molar regions but not in an ultrathin configuration (0.5 mm).","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"66 1","pages":"50-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2018.10.02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Aim: To compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with different occlusal thickness.  Materials and methods: Thirty CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with different occlusal thickness were randomly distributed into 3 experimental groups: 0.5 mm (group 1), 1.0 mm (group 2) and 1.5 mm (group 3). The restorations were cemented onto human molars with a self-adhesive resin cement. The specimens were loaded until fracture; the fracture resistance and mode of failure were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed with the one-way ANOVA followed by the Fisher’s Exact test with Bonferroni’s correction (p=0.05). Results: The fracture resistance values of all the specimens exceeded the maximum physiological occlusal loads in molar regions. The highest fracture resistance was noticed in 1.0 mm-thick crowns. Ultrathin restorations (group 1) proved to be statistically less resistant to fracture than those of the other experimental groups (p<0.05). The crowns were mainly interested by unrestorable fractures. Conclusions: The occlusal thickness of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns influences either the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of the restorations; the occlusal thickness of such restorations can be reduced up to a lower bound of 1.0 mm in order to keep sufficient strength to withstand occlusal loads; CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns showed sufficient fracture resistance to be used in molar regions but not in an ultrathin configuration (0.5 mm).
不同咬合厚度CAD-CAM整体式二硅酸锂臼齿冠抗断裂性能的体外分析
目的:比较不同咬合厚度CAD-CAM单片二硅酸锂冠的抗折性和失效模式。材料与方法:将30个不同咬合厚度的CAD-CAM单片二硅酸锂冠随机分为0.5 mm(1组)、1.0 mm(2组)和1.5 mm(3组)3个实验组,采用自粘树脂粘固剂将修复体粘接在人磨牙上。试件加载至断裂;记录了试件的断裂抗力和破坏模式。采用单因素方差分析,采用Fisher精确检验,Bonferroni校正(p=0.05)。结果:所有标本的断裂阻力值均超过磨牙区最大生理咬合负荷。冠层厚度为1.0 mm时抗断裂能力最强。超薄修复体(1组)的抗骨折性明显低于其他实验组(p<0.05)。牙冠主要受不可修复骨折的影响。结论:CAD-CAM单片二硅酸锂冠的咬合厚度影响修复体的抗断裂能力和失效模式;这种修复体的咬合厚度可以减少到1.0 mm的下界,以保持足够的强度来承受咬合负荷;CAD-CAM单片二硅酸锂冠在磨牙区域显示出足够的抗断裂能力,但在超薄结构(0.5 mm)中表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信