Management of Gastric Varices: IR Perspective

Mario Dervishi, C. Sutter, R. Varma
{"title":"Management of Gastric Varices: IR Perspective","authors":"Mario Dervishi, C. Sutter, R. Varma","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gastric varices are a sequela of portal hypertension. If left untreated, life-threatening bleeding can occur. While endoscopic treatment is traditionally considered as a first-line interventional option, endovascular techniques have emerged to become the superior option in certain clinical scenarios, either as a first-line therapy or a salvage therapy. Endovascular techniques for managing gastric varices include transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), coil, and plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration, as well as a combination of both. Studies have shown that endovascular techniques can effectively control bleeding from gastric varices, with high success rates and low complication rates, and significantly reduce recurrence. TIPS placement has shown to be more effective in controlling bleeding from gastroesophageal varices, while BRTO, coil, or plug-assisted embolizations are more suitable for patients with isolated gastric varices. Endovascular interventions are a valuable option for managing gastric varices, especially in patients who are not candidates for endoscopic treatment or who have failed previous endoscopic interventions. In this two-part series editorial, we aim to initially review the complex anatomy and classification of gastric varices, medical management, and current endovascular interventional techniques, and how they compare with one another. In part 2, we draw a parallel between endovascular versus endoscopic techniques, and highlight and critically review current literature as it pertains to gastric variceal management.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Gastric varices are a sequela of portal hypertension. If left untreated, life-threatening bleeding can occur. While endoscopic treatment is traditionally considered as a first-line interventional option, endovascular techniques have emerged to become the superior option in certain clinical scenarios, either as a first-line therapy or a salvage therapy. Endovascular techniques for managing gastric varices include transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), coil, and plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration, as well as a combination of both. Studies have shown that endovascular techniques can effectively control bleeding from gastric varices, with high success rates and low complication rates, and significantly reduce recurrence. TIPS placement has shown to be more effective in controlling bleeding from gastroesophageal varices, while BRTO, coil, or plug-assisted embolizations are more suitable for patients with isolated gastric varices. Endovascular interventions are a valuable option for managing gastric varices, especially in patients who are not candidates for endoscopic treatment or who have failed previous endoscopic interventions. In this two-part series editorial, we aim to initially review the complex anatomy and classification of gastric varices, medical management, and current endovascular interventional techniques, and how they compare with one another. In part 2, we draw a parallel between endovascular versus endoscopic techniques, and highlight and critically review current literature as it pertains to gastric variceal management.
胃静脉曲张的处理:红外透视
胃静脉曲张是门静脉高压的后遗症。如果不及时治疗,可能会发生危及生命的出血。虽然内镜治疗传统上被认为是一线介入治疗的选择,但在某些临床情况下,作为一线治疗或救助治疗,血管内技术已经成为更好的选择。处理胃静脉曲张的血管内技术包括经颈静脉肝内门静脉分流术(TIPS)置入、球囊闭塞逆行经静脉闭塞术(BRTO)、线圈和塞辅助逆行经静脉闭塞术,以及两者的结合。研究表明,血管内技术可有效控制胃静脉曲张出血,成功率高,并发症发生率低,显著降低复发率。TIPS放置在控制胃食管静脉曲张出血方面更有效,而BRTO、线圈或桥塞辅助栓塞更适合于孤立性胃静脉曲张患者。血管内介入治疗是治疗胃静脉曲张的一个有价值的选择,特别是对于那些不适合内窥镜治疗或之前内窥镜干预失败的患者。在这个由两部分组成的系列社论中,我们旨在初步回顾胃静脉曲张的复杂解剖和分类、医疗管理和目前的血管内介入技术,以及它们之间的比较。在第2部分,我们在血管内与内窥镜技术之间画了一个平行,并强调和批判性地回顾了当前的文献,因为它与胃静脉曲张治疗有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信