Structural design and performance characteristics of the fluidic sprinkler application technology for saving irrigation water: a review

IF 2.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
F. Dwomoh, Xingye Zhu, Alexander Fordjour, Junping Liu, S. Yuan, Hong Li
{"title":"Structural design and performance characteristics of the fluidic sprinkler application technology for saving irrigation water: a review","authors":"F. Dwomoh, Xingye Zhu, Alexander Fordjour, Junping Liu, S. Yuan, Hong Li","doi":"10.4081/jae.2023.1452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fluidic sprinkler was designed to have the prospect of a simple design, ease of construction, low energy consumption, and water saving. The present review focused on the fluidic sprinkler, compared the performance parameters of the fluidic sprinkler with the impact sprinkler, and highlighted the main challenges associated with the fluidic sprinkler. Even though the fluidic sprinkler compares quite well with the impact sprinkler, the review highlighted that the fluidic sprinkler appears to have more variability in application rate (0-1.5 mm/h) than the impact sprinkler (0-0.8 mm/h). The wetted radii were, on average, less than the impact sprinkler by 9.7, 9.3, 11.0, and 9.9% at 200, 250, 300, and 350 kPa operating pressures, respectively. Experiments on the fluidic sprinkler have mainly concentrated on the structural design of the fluidic component, water distribution profile, coefficient of uniformity, droplet size characterisation, and rotation uniformity, as well as the effect of different nozzle sizes on hydraulic performance under varying discharge and pressure conditions ranging from 100-500 kPa under indoor conditions. However, experimental studies on its performance in the field remain scanty. Statistical analysis of research papers published on the fluidic sprinkler indicates that less than 10% of the studies focused on the performance of the fluidic sprinkler on the field, and more than 90% on the design, structural and hydraulic performance under indoor conditions. Rotation stability of the fluidic sprinkler and testing with different sizes of the nozzle under low-pressure conditions on the field require further research to achieve energy and water saving through optimisation of the operating conditions.","PeriodicalId":48507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2023.1452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fluidic sprinkler was designed to have the prospect of a simple design, ease of construction, low energy consumption, and water saving. The present review focused on the fluidic sprinkler, compared the performance parameters of the fluidic sprinkler with the impact sprinkler, and highlighted the main challenges associated with the fluidic sprinkler. Even though the fluidic sprinkler compares quite well with the impact sprinkler, the review highlighted that the fluidic sprinkler appears to have more variability in application rate (0-1.5 mm/h) than the impact sprinkler (0-0.8 mm/h). The wetted radii were, on average, less than the impact sprinkler by 9.7, 9.3, 11.0, and 9.9% at 200, 250, 300, and 350 kPa operating pressures, respectively. Experiments on the fluidic sprinkler have mainly concentrated on the structural design of the fluidic component, water distribution profile, coefficient of uniformity, droplet size characterisation, and rotation uniformity, as well as the effect of different nozzle sizes on hydraulic performance under varying discharge and pressure conditions ranging from 100-500 kPa under indoor conditions. However, experimental studies on its performance in the field remain scanty. Statistical analysis of research papers published on the fluidic sprinkler indicates that less than 10% of the studies focused on the performance of the fluidic sprinkler on the field, and more than 90% on the design, structural and hydraulic performance under indoor conditions. Rotation stability of the fluidic sprinkler and testing with different sizes of the nozzle under low-pressure conditions on the field require further research to achieve energy and water saving through optimisation of the operating conditions.
节水型喷灌应用技术的结构设计与性能特点综述
射流喷头具有设计简单、施工方便、能耗低、节水等优点。本文对射流喷头进行了综述,比较了射流喷头与冲击式喷头的性能参数,指出了射流喷头面临的主要挑战。尽管流体喷头与冲击式喷头相比效果相当好,但综述强调,流体喷头的施用量(0-1.5 mm/h)似乎比冲击式喷头(0-0.8 mm/h)有更多的可变性。在200、250、300和350 kPa工况下,湿化半径平均比冲击式喷头小9.7、9.3、11.0%和9.9%。对射流喷头的实验主要集中在射流元件的结构设计、配水剖面、均匀性系数、液滴尺寸特性、旋转均匀性等方面,以及在室内100-500 kPa不同流量和压力条件下,不同喷嘴尺寸对水力性能的影响。然而,对其现场性能的实验研究仍然很少。通过对已发表的流体洒水器研究论文的统计分析可知,关注流体洒水器现场性能的研究不足10%,而关注室内工况下的设计、结构和水力性能的研究超过90%。射流喷头在低压工况下的旋转稳定性及不同喷嘴尺寸的现场测试需要进一步研究,通过优化运行工况实现节能节水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Journal of Agricultural Engineering AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Engineering (JAE) is the official journal of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering supported by University of Bologna, Italy. The subject matter covers a complete and interdisciplinary range of research in engineering for agriculture and biosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信