Abstract P5-07-10: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HER2-ve advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts) according to the molecular subtype in the era of modern agents. Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study

M. Cazzaniga, S. Placido, A. D’Alonzo, M. Piezzo, C. Natoli, A. Milani, A. Bologna, M. Alú, A. Turletti, P. Pugliese, L. Biganzoli, C. D. Angelis, O. Garrone, P. Marchetti, F. Riccardi, A. Bernardo, L. Livi, A. Fabi, C. Taverniti, E. Romagnoli, P. Pronzato, G. Mustacchi
{"title":"Abstract P5-07-10: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HER2-ve advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts) according to the molecular subtype in the era of modern agents. Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study","authors":"M. Cazzaniga, S. Placido, A. D’Alonzo, M. Piezzo, C. Natoli, A. Milani, A. Bologna, M. Alú, A. Turletti, P. Pugliese, L. Biganzoli, C. D. Angelis, O. Garrone, P. Marchetti, F. Riccardi, A. Bernardo, L. Livi, A. Fabi, C. Taverniti, E. Romagnoli, P. Pronzato, G. Mustacchi","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-07-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Pts with ABC have a diverse clinical course and OS rates vary significantly among pts. New strategies had potentially changed the natural history of these pts, however data from clinical studies are still lacking and Real-World Studies (RWS) are crucial in clinical outcome evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, aiming to describe the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment in HER2-ve ABC pts receiving at least one CHT (SABCS 2016, P5-15-07 & P5-14-09) in the years 2012-2015. The present analysis is focused on the description of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and OS according to the biologic subtype in the deceased population. So far, 791/1500 pts have been registered into the study and 255 (32.2%) are evaluable. Time to event analysis between subtypes was evaluated by Cox-Mantel Hazard Ratio and Logrank Test. DFS by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test RESULTS Pts distribution according to molecular subtype was: Luminal A (86, 33.7%), Luminal B (107 (42.1%), TNBC (62, 24.3%). Median ages at diagnosis were 55.8, 52.9 and 55.1 years for the 3 subgroups, respectively. Mean DFS was significantly different according to the molecular subtypes: 87.28, 61.37 and 23.9 months. The difference between Luminal B and TNBC is statistically significant as well. Mean PFS of 1st-line therapy was 17.9 11.7 and 7.8 months respectively. Mean OS from 1stprogression was 32.9 24.2 and 15.8 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data confirm in a RWS the different biological behaviour between Lum A and B. Metastatic life span is quite good for Luminals and disappointing for TNBC. Median time from last CHT and Death is quite short and similar. Citation Format: Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Sabino De Placido, Alessia D9Alonzo, Michela Piezzo, Clara Natoli, Andrea Milani, Alessandra Bologna, Massimiliano Alu, Anna Turletti, Palma Pugliese, Laura Biganzoli, Claudia De Angelis, Ornella Garrone, Paolo Marchetti, Ferdinando Riccardi, Antonio Bernardo, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandra Fabi, Cristiana Taverniti, Emanuela Romagnoli, Paolo Pronzato, Giorgio Mustacchi, on behalf of GIM-13 AMBRA Study Group. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HER2-ve advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts) according to the molecular subtype in the era of modern agents. Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-10.","PeriodicalId":20307,"journal":{"name":"Poster Session Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-07-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pts with ABC have a diverse clinical course and OS rates vary significantly among pts. New strategies had potentially changed the natural history of these pts, however data from clinical studies are still lacking and Real-World Studies (RWS) are crucial in clinical outcome evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, aiming to describe the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment in HER2-ve ABC pts receiving at least one CHT (SABCS 2016, P5-15-07 & P5-14-09) in the years 2012-2015. The present analysis is focused on the description of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and OS according to the biologic subtype in the deceased population. So far, 791/1500 pts have been registered into the study and 255 (32.2%) are evaluable. Time to event analysis between subtypes was evaluated by Cox-Mantel Hazard Ratio and Logrank Test. DFS by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test RESULTS Pts distribution according to molecular subtype was: Luminal A (86, 33.7%), Luminal B (107 (42.1%), TNBC (62, 24.3%). Median ages at diagnosis were 55.8, 52.9 and 55.1 years for the 3 subgroups, respectively. Mean DFS was significantly different according to the molecular subtypes: 87.28, 61.37 and 23.9 months. The difference between Luminal B and TNBC is statistically significant as well. Mean PFS of 1st-line therapy was 17.9 11.7 and 7.8 months respectively. Mean OS from 1stprogression was 32.9 24.2 and 15.8 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data confirm in a RWS the different biological behaviour between Lum A and B. Metastatic life span is quite good for Luminals and disappointing for TNBC. Median time from last CHT and Death is quite short and similar. Citation Format: Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Sabino De Placido, Alessia D9Alonzo, Michela Piezzo, Clara Natoli, Andrea Milani, Alessandra Bologna, Massimiliano Alu, Anna Turletti, Palma Pugliese, Laura Biganzoli, Claudia De Angelis, Ornella Garrone, Paolo Marchetti, Ferdinando Riccardi, Antonio Bernardo, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandra Fabi, Cristiana Taverniti, Emanuela Romagnoli, Paolo Pronzato, Giorgio Mustacchi, on behalf of GIM-13 AMBRA Study Group. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HER2-ve advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts) according to the molecular subtype in the era of modern agents. Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-10.
摘要P5-07-10:在现代药物时代,HER2-ve晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者(pts)根据分子亚型的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。imm -13 AMBRA研究结果
背景:ABC患者的临床病程各不相同,患者的总生存率差异很大。新的策略有可能改变这些pts的自然历史,然而临床研究的数据仍然缺乏,现实世界研究(RWS)在临床结果评估中至关重要。患者和方法AMBRA是一项纵向队列研究,旨在描述2012-2015年间接受至少一次CHT治疗的HER2-ve ABC患者的一线和后续治疗选择(SABCS 2016, P5-15-07和P5-14-09)。目前的分析集中在描述无进展生存(PFS)和OS根据生物学亚型在死亡人群。到目前为止,已有791/1500名患者登记参加研究,其中255名(32.2%)可评估。采用Cox-Mantel风险比和Logrank检验评估各亚型之间的事件发生时间分析。按分子亚型划分的Pts分布为:Luminal A(86, 33.7%)、Luminal B(107, 42.1%)、TNBC(62, 24.3%)。3个亚组的中位诊断年龄分别为55.8岁、52.9岁和55.1岁。分子亚型的平均DFS分别为87.28、61.37和23.9个月,差异有统计学意义。Luminal B与TNBC的差异也有统计学意义。一线治疗的平均PFS分别为17.9、11.7和7.8个月。第一进展期的平均OS分别为32.9个月、24.2个月和15.8个月。结论:我们的数据在RWS中证实了Lum a和b之间不同的生物学行为,对于Luminals来说,转移寿命相当好,而对于TNBC来说,则令人失望。从上次CHT到死亡的中间时间很短而且相似。引用格式:Marina Elena Cazzaniga、Sabino De Placido、Alessia D9Alonzo、Michela Piezzo、Clara Natoli、Andrea Milani、Alessandra Bologna、Massimiliano Alu、Anna Turletti、Palma Pugliese、Laura Biganzoli、Claudia De Angelis、Ornella Garrone、Paolo Marchetti、Ferdinando Riccardi、Antonio Bernardo、Lorenzo Livi、Alessandra Fabi、Cristiana Taverniti、Emanuela Romagnoli、Paolo Pronzato、Giorgio Mustacchi代表gimm -13 AMBRA研究小组。现代药物时代HER2-ve晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者(pts)按分子亚型的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)imm -13 AMBRA研究结果[摘要]。摘自:2019年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2019年12月10日至14日;费城(PA): AACR;中国癌症杂志,2020;31(增刊):P5-07-10。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信