Comparison of Analytical Characteristics of Commercial and in-House Methods for DNA Isolation from Paraffin Histology Blocks

N. A. Os’kina, A. Avdalyan, D. Subbotin, A. Lazarev, A. Kel, N. Kushlinskii, M. Filipenko
{"title":"Comparison of Analytical Characteristics of Commercial and in-House Methods for DNA Isolation from Paraffin Histology Blocks","authors":"N. A. Os’kina, A. Avdalyan, D. Subbotin, A. Lazarev, A. Kel, N. Kushlinskii, M. Filipenko","doi":"10.6000/1927-7229.2017.06.01.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the hotspots in clinical research today is molecular genetic analysis of structural DNA alterations. Working with DNA obtained from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens is particularly challenging, due to cross-linking and fragmentation of DNA. We performed a comparative analysis of DNA extraction methods from FFPE tissue using two in-house protocols and Qiagen (QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit) and Roche (High Pure FFPET DNA Isolation Kit) commercial kits presented in the Russian market and used in clinical practice. To assess the quantity and quality of the isolated DNA, we used the real-time PCR to rate DNA yield, the inhibited impurity content and the degree of fragmentation. Our findings may be useful for a medical laboratory that performs testing of somatic mutations for the targeted therapy selection, and researchers who specialized in tumor genome structure studies in respect to patient prognosis and prediction of the sensitivity or resistance of tumor cells to therapy.","PeriodicalId":14957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","volume":"69 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-7229.2017.06.01.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the hotspots in clinical research today is molecular genetic analysis of structural DNA alterations. Working with DNA obtained from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens is particularly challenging, due to cross-linking and fragmentation of DNA. We performed a comparative analysis of DNA extraction methods from FFPE tissue using two in-house protocols and Qiagen (QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit) and Roche (High Pure FFPET DNA Isolation Kit) commercial kits presented in the Russian market and used in clinical practice. To assess the quantity and quality of the isolated DNA, we used the real-time PCR to rate DNA yield, the inhibited impurity content and the degree of fragmentation. Our findings may be useful for a medical laboratory that performs testing of somatic mutations for the targeted therapy selection, and researchers who specialized in tumor genome structure studies in respect to patient prognosis and prediction of the sensitivity or resistance of tumor cells to therapy.
从石蜡组织块中分离DNA的商业和内部方法的分析特性比较
DNA结构改变的分子遗传学分析是当今临床研究的热点之一。由于DNA的交联和断裂,使用从福尔马林固定和石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织标本中获得的DNA尤其具有挑战性。我们使用两种内部方案和Qiagen (QIAamp DNA FFPE组织试剂盒)和Roche(高纯FFPET DNA分离试剂盒)在俄罗斯市场上推出并用于临床实践的商用试剂盒,对FFPE组织的DNA提取方法进行了比较分析。为了评估分离DNA的数量和质量,我们使用real-time PCR对DNA产率、抑制杂质含量和片段化程度进行评分。我们的发现可能对医学实验室进行体细胞突变测试以进行靶向治疗选择,以及专门从事肿瘤基因组结构研究的研究人员在患者预后和肿瘤细胞对治疗的敏感性或耐药性预测方面有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信