Developing Assessment Instruments of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Trigonometry Material Mathematics Subjects

M. I. Hakim, Kartono Kartono, W. Lestari
{"title":"Developing Assessment Instruments of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Trigonometry Material Mathematics Subjects","authors":"M. I. Hakim, Kartono Kartono, W. Lestari","doi":"10.15294/jere.v8i1.31551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preliminary study found that the teacher did not yet have a practical instrument to assess students' critical thinking skills in mathematics. This study aims to develop assessment guidelines for students' critical thinking skills in practical mathematics subjects. The development model refers to the theory of Borg and Gall with 9 steps of development. Small-scale test subjects were conducted on 21 students and a large-scale test was conducted on 90 grade X students of MIPA SMA N 1 Pringgasela. The content validity in this study used the Aiken's V formula and the Ebel formula to look for reliability. Whereas the construct validation with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model used the AMOS 24 application. The results showed that: (1) the validity of the contents of the instrument, from the aspects of construction, language, and material got the score > 0.3, which means that the instrument was stated to be very valid in content, and very reliable in values > 0.5; (2) contract validity, loading factor per item > 0.3 means that the instrument was valid in contract, the RMSEA value = 0.023 < 0.06, and the GFI value = 0.932 > 0.9, which means that the model developed was very suitable; (3) validation of the items showed that items 5 and 11 were accepted with a slight revision because d < 0.4 and the remaining 10 items were received without revision with d > 0.4, for Alpha Crombach values = 0, 783> 0.5 (very reliable instruments ); (4) practicality test used all math teachers (5 teachers), with an average score of 85.6 means that the instrument was very practical. In conclusion, the instruments developed were very valid, very reliable and very practical. The benefits of the development results were, there were guidelines in carrying out assessment of students' critical thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":30816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v8i1.31551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The preliminary study found that the teacher did not yet have a practical instrument to assess students' critical thinking skills in mathematics. This study aims to develop assessment guidelines for students' critical thinking skills in practical mathematics subjects. The development model refers to the theory of Borg and Gall with 9 steps of development. Small-scale test subjects were conducted on 21 students and a large-scale test was conducted on 90 grade X students of MIPA SMA N 1 Pringgasela. The content validity in this study used the Aiken's V formula and the Ebel formula to look for reliability. Whereas the construct validation with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model used the AMOS 24 application. The results showed that: (1) the validity of the contents of the instrument, from the aspects of construction, language, and material got the score > 0.3, which means that the instrument was stated to be very valid in content, and very reliable in values > 0.5; (2) contract validity, loading factor per item > 0.3 means that the instrument was valid in contract, the RMSEA value = 0.023 < 0.06, and the GFI value = 0.932 > 0.9, which means that the model developed was very suitable; (3) validation of the items showed that items 5 and 11 were accepted with a slight revision because d < 0.4 and the remaining 10 items were received without revision with d > 0.4, for Alpha Crombach values = 0, 783> 0.5 (very reliable instruments ); (4) practicality test used all math teachers (5 teachers), with an average score of 85.6 means that the instrument was very practical. In conclusion, the instruments developed were very valid, very reliable and very practical. The benefits of the development results were, there were guidelines in carrying out assessment of students' critical thinking skills.
开发三角材料数学科目学生批判性思维能力评价工具
初步研究发现,教师还没有一个实用的工具来评估学生在数学中的批判性思维能力。本研究旨在建立数学实务科目学生批判性思维能力的评量指引。发展模式参照博格和加尔的理论,分为9个发展阶段。对21名学生进行小规模测试,对90名MIPA SMA N 1 Pringgasela X年级学生进行大规模测试。本研究的内容效度采用Aiken的V公式和Ebel公式寻找信度。而结构验证与验证性因子分析(CFA)模型使用AMOS 24应用程序。结果表明:(1)量表内容的效度,从结构、语言、材料三个方面得到> 0.3分,表示量表在内容上非常有效,在值上非常可靠> 0.5;(2)合同有效性,每项载荷因子> 0.3表示该仪器在合同中有效,RMSEA值= 0.023 < 0.06,GFI值= 0.932 > 0.9,表示所开发的模型非常合适;(3)由于Alpha cronbach值= 0,783 > 0.5(非常可靠的仪器),第5项和第11项经轻微修改后被接受,因为d < 0.4;其余10项未经修改被接受,因为d < 0.4;(4)实用性测试采用了全部数学教师(5名教师),平均得分为85.6,说明该仪器实用性很强。总之,所研制的仪器非常有效、可靠、实用。发展结果的好处是,有指导方针进行评估学生的批判性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书