M. Dalli, F. Atakul, E. Bahşi, B. Ince, C. Şahbaz, H. Çolak, E. Ercan
{"title":"A comparison of the levels of microleakage of five adhesive systems","authors":"M. Dalli, F. Atakul, E. Bahşi, B. Ince, C. Şahbaz, H. Çolak, E. Ercan","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.116038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was a comparative assessment of in vitro microleakage of five different new generation self-etching adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: One hundred recently extracted fresh caries-free human permanent molars were used. Teeth were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n = 20). Clearfil S 3 Bond (Group I), Xeno V (Group II), G Bond (guanine-cytosine) (Group III), Optibond All in One (Group IV) and iBond (Group V) were applied, then polymerized with light emitting diode and restored with a nanofill composite. Teeth were coated twice with acid resistant varnish and immersed in 0.5% methylene blue. Specimens were cut bucco-palatinally/lingually, with microleakage scores evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4 under a stereomicroscope and then analyzed under a scanning electron microscope. Results: The differences among the gingival and occlusal microleakage scores of the groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) (P = 0.043, P = 0.005). Occlusal microleakage scores of Clearfil S 3 Bond and Optibond All in One were considerably lower than those of the other three groups. While the highest microleakage was observed with iBond, there was no statistical difference between the Xeno V and G Bond groups (P > 0.05). The highest gingival microleakage scores were in the iBond group; though, statistically there was no significant difference among the other groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The occlusal and gingival microleakage scores of self-etching adhesive systems in this study were satisfactory except for one group (Group V-iBond).","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"67 1","pages":"66 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.116038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was a comparative assessment of in vitro microleakage of five different new generation self-etching adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: One hundred recently extracted fresh caries-free human permanent molars were used. Teeth were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n = 20). Clearfil S 3 Bond (Group I), Xeno V (Group II), G Bond (guanine-cytosine) (Group III), Optibond All in One (Group IV) and iBond (Group V) were applied, then polymerized with light emitting diode and restored with a nanofill composite. Teeth were coated twice with acid resistant varnish and immersed in 0.5% methylene blue. Specimens were cut bucco-palatinally/lingually, with microleakage scores evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4 under a stereomicroscope and then analyzed under a scanning electron microscope. Results: The differences among the gingival and occlusal microleakage scores of the groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) (P = 0.043, P = 0.005). Occlusal microleakage scores of Clearfil S 3 Bond and Optibond All in One were considerably lower than those of the other three groups. While the highest microleakage was observed with iBond, there was no statistical difference between the Xeno V and G Bond groups (P > 0.05). The highest gingival microleakage scores were in the iBond group; though, statistically there was no significant difference among the other groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The occlusal and gingival microleakage scores of self-etching adhesive systems in this study were satisfactory except for one group (Group V-iBond).
目的:比较评价五种不同的新一代自蚀刻胶粘剂体系的体外微渗漏。材料与方法:采用新鲜无龋恒磨牙100颗。牙齿随机分为5组(n = 20)。应用Clearfil S 3 Bond (I组),Xeno V (II组),G Bond(鸟嘌呤-胞嘧啶)(III组),Optibond All in One (IV组)和iBond (V组),然后用发光二极管聚合,用纳米填充复合材料修复。牙齿涂两次耐酸清漆,浸入0.5%亚甲基蓝。在体视显微镜下对标本进行0 ~ 4分的微漏评分,然后在扫描电镜下进行分析。结果:各组牙龈、牙合微漏评分差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05) (P = 0.043, P = 0.005)。clearfils3 Bond和Optibond All in One的咬合微漏评分明显低于其他三组。Bond组微渗漏率最高,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。牙龈微漏评分以bond组最高;其他组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:本研究自蚀刻粘接系统除1组(V-iBond组)外,其牙合和牙龈微漏评分均令人满意。