An Analysis of European Public Opinion on the Russo-Ukrainian War and its Determinants

{"title":"An Analysis of European Public Opinion on the Russo-Ukrainian War and its Determinants","authors":"","doi":"10.29274/ews.2023.35.1.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines public opinion in European countries on the Russo-Ukrainian war and the EU’s sanctions against Russia. In particular, it investigates the different perceptions of issues related to the war in Ukraine in terms of security and economic implications and seeks to explain the differences in public opinions among European countries. Leading public opinions in Europe strongly condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and agree to impose strong sanctions. However, there are different attitudes in public opinion depending on the expected economic damage and energy mix. Countries concerned about significant economic damage due to rising energy prices tend to prefer measures that take the economic impact into account rather than value-oriented hard-line responses. Additionally, countries with a high proportion of fossil fuel use also show the same tendency. On the other hand, countries that can endure economic damage and better respond to energy crises with a high share of renewable energy prefer a hard-line response. Countries with a favorable image of Russia have a relatively solid public opinion insisting on considering the economic situation, while countries with a pro-American tendency demand a hard-line response based on values. In terms of diplomacy and security, it was found that the more countries feel the security threat from the war, the more public opinion supports a value-centered policy stance and insists on military aid to Ukraine. In particular, the three Nordic countries, which have a long tradition of neutrality, judge Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a threat to fundamental European values and are more in favor of military aid to Ukraine than other countries. This study provides significant implications for forecasting the EU’s response to Russia. For the EU to maintain a strong stance against Russia, it is essential to secure solidarity among the members. The EU will need to coordinate the different economic burdens of its Member States and fully reflect the varying security awareness of European countries on its common security and defense policy. These efforts are necessary to maintain a solid and coherent policy stance on the war in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":84986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of East and West studies","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of East and West studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29274/ews.2023.35.1.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines public opinion in European countries on the Russo-Ukrainian war and the EU’s sanctions against Russia. In particular, it investigates the different perceptions of issues related to the war in Ukraine in terms of security and economic implications and seeks to explain the differences in public opinions among European countries. Leading public opinions in Europe strongly condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and agree to impose strong sanctions. However, there are different attitudes in public opinion depending on the expected economic damage and energy mix. Countries concerned about significant economic damage due to rising energy prices tend to prefer measures that take the economic impact into account rather than value-oriented hard-line responses. Additionally, countries with a high proportion of fossil fuel use also show the same tendency. On the other hand, countries that can endure economic damage and better respond to energy crises with a high share of renewable energy prefer a hard-line response. Countries with a favorable image of Russia have a relatively solid public opinion insisting on considering the economic situation, while countries with a pro-American tendency demand a hard-line response based on values. In terms of diplomacy and security, it was found that the more countries feel the security threat from the war, the more public opinion supports a value-centered policy stance and insists on military aid to Ukraine. In particular, the three Nordic countries, which have a long tradition of neutrality, judge Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a threat to fundamental European values and are more in favor of military aid to Ukraine than other countries. This study provides significant implications for forecasting the EU’s response to Russia. For the EU to maintain a strong stance against Russia, it is essential to secure solidarity among the members. The EU will need to coordinate the different economic burdens of its Member States and fully reflect the varying security awareness of European countries on its common security and defense policy. These efforts are necessary to maintain a solid and coherent policy stance on the war in Ukraine.
欧洲舆论对俄乌战争及其决定因素的分析
本研究考察了欧洲国家对俄乌战争和欧盟对俄制裁的民意。特别是,它调查了在安全和经济影响方面对乌克兰战争相关问题的不同看法,并试图解释欧洲国家之间公众意见的差异。欧洲主要舆论强烈谴责俄罗斯入侵乌克兰,并同意实施严厉制裁。然而,根据预期的经济损失和能源结构,公众舆论的态度有所不同。担心能源价格上涨会造成重大经济损失的国家倾向于采取考虑经济影响的措施,而不是以价值为导向的强硬措施。此外,化石燃料使用比例高的国家也显示出同样的趋势。另一方面,那些能够承受经济损失并能以高可再生能源比例更好地应对能源危机的国家更倾向于采取强硬的应对措施。对俄罗斯有好感的国家的舆论相对稳固,要求考虑经济状况,而亲美倾向的国家则要求以价值观为基础的强硬应对。在外交和安全方面,研究发现,越是感受到战争带来的安全威胁的国家,越倾向于支持价值中心的政策立场,坚持对乌克兰的军事援助。特别是具有长期中立传统的北欧三国,认为俄罗斯入侵乌克兰是对欧洲基本价值观的威胁,比其他国家更支持对乌克兰的军事援助。本研究为预测欧盟对俄罗斯的反应提供了重要的启示。欧盟要对俄罗斯保持强硬立场,就必须确保成员国之间的团结。欧盟需要协调成员国不同的经济负担,充分反映欧洲各国对欧盟共同安全和防务政策的不同安全意识。这些努力对于在乌克兰战争问题上保持坚定和一致的政策立场是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信