J. Naqvi, S. I. Ali, V. Parmar, C. Oh, S. Beardmore, N. Subedi
{"title":"Comprehensive Radiological Assessment of Sub-axial Spinal Injury","authors":"J. Naqvi, S. I. Ali, V. Parmar, C. Oh, S. Beardmore, N. Subedi","doi":"10.3126/NMJ.V2I1.24351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiologists frequently interpret cross-sectional imaging of the spine in the setting of trauma. Mechanical stability of the traumatised spine is the single most important factor which guides further management. \nSeveral classification systems have been developed over the past to assist radiologists to judge the potentially unstable injuries. The radiologists are arguably most familiar with Denis system of classification which is based on injury morphology and mechanism. This system has been criticised for being too simple, not prognostically valuable and lack of consideration of patients' neurological status. AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) and TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score ) classification systems are the next major evolutions which highlight the importance of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and neurological status of the patients in predicting the potentially unstable fracture. \nThe aim of this pictorial review is to familiarise radiologists with newer classification systems to improve their image interpretation skills and promote efficient communication with spinal surgeons. The pictorial examples are intended to illustrate the various injury types and how to classify them according to the aforementioned classification systems.","PeriodicalId":52856,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Medical Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/NMJ.V2I1.24351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Radiologists frequently interpret cross-sectional imaging of the spine in the setting of trauma. Mechanical stability of the traumatised spine is the single most important factor which guides further management.
Several classification systems have been developed over the past to assist radiologists to judge the potentially unstable injuries. The radiologists are arguably most familiar with Denis system of classification which is based on injury morphology and mechanism. This system has been criticised for being too simple, not prognostically valuable and lack of consideration of patients' neurological status. AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) and TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score ) classification systems are the next major evolutions which highlight the importance of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and neurological status of the patients in predicting the potentially unstable fracture.
The aim of this pictorial review is to familiarise radiologists with newer classification systems to improve their image interpretation skills and promote efficient communication with spinal surgeons. The pictorial examples are intended to illustrate the various injury types and how to classify them according to the aforementioned classification systems.
放射科医生经常在创伤的情况下解释脊柱的横断成像。损伤脊柱的机械稳定性是指导进一步治疗的最重要因素。过去已经开发了几种分类系统,以帮助放射科医生判断潜在的不稳定损伤。放射科医生最熟悉的是基于损伤形态和机制的丹尼斯分类系统。该系统被批评过于简单,没有预后价值,缺乏对患者神经系统状态的考虑。AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft f r osteosynthesis efragen)和TLICS(胸腰椎损伤分类和严重程度评分)分类系统是下一个主要的进化,它们强调了后韧带复合体(PLC)和患者神经系统状态在预测潜在不稳定骨折中的重要性。这篇图片综述的目的是让放射科医生熟悉新的分类系统,以提高他们的图像解释技能,并促进与脊柱外科医生的有效沟通。图像示例旨在说明各种伤害类型以及如何根据上述分类系统对其进行分类。