Knowledge, Art, and Power: An Outline of a Theory of Experience by John Ryder (review)

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 N/A PHILOSOPHY
K. Puolakka
{"title":"Knowledge, Art, and Power: An Outline of a Theory of Experience by John Ryder (review)","authors":"K. Puolakka","doi":"10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.57.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do not let the subtitle fool you. “An outline” is a far too modest description of Ryder’s book, for it presents an interesting and carefully crafted account of experience in the broadly pragmatic naturalist framework. The author mentions John Dewey’s notion of aesthetic experience as his primary background inspiration and his analysis is at its best in the aesthetic parts of the work, which is by no means to discredit the merits of its other major sections that deal with the cognitive and the political dimensions of experience in interesting ways. Indeed, Ryder’s book is among the most important texts in the tradition of pragmatist aesthetics of recent years and everyone interested in pursuing aesthetics in the spirit of Dewey’s Art as Experience should find it an interesting read. The Deweyan idea of experience as an interaction with the environment, substantiated with recent work on embodiment (Shusterman, Johnson) and enactivism (Rowlands, Noë), serves as the bedrock of Ryder’s approach to experience. He, however, argues that these more contemporary views lack a proper ontological grounding, which Ryder seeks to establish with a position he calls “ordinal ontology.” This kind of ontology views all entities as multilayered complexes, which are constituted by their relationships to other complexes. Instead of trying to distinguish external relations from internal ones, we should be looking at the level of constitution. All relations are constitutive, in Ryder’s view, but some relations are more constitutive of a complex than others. What follows is an emergent view of reality: more complex complexes—mind, culture—emerge from the interaction between simpler complexes, but cannot be reduced to them.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.57.1.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do not let the subtitle fool you. “An outline” is a far too modest description of Ryder’s book, for it presents an interesting and carefully crafted account of experience in the broadly pragmatic naturalist framework. The author mentions John Dewey’s notion of aesthetic experience as his primary background inspiration and his analysis is at its best in the aesthetic parts of the work, which is by no means to discredit the merits of its other major sections that deal with the cognitive and the political dimensions of experience in interesting ways. Indeed, Ryder’s book is among the most important texts in the tradition of pragmatist aesthetics of recent years and everyone interested in pursuing aesthetics in the spirit of Dewey’s Art as Experience should find it an interesting read. The Deweyan idea of experience as an interaction with the environment, substantiated with recent work on embodiment (Shusterman, Johnson) and enactivism (Rowlands, Noë), serves as the bedrock of Ryder’s approach to experience. He, however, argues that these more contemporary views lack a proper ontological grounding, which Ryder seeks to establish with a position he calls “ordinal ontology.” This kind of ontology views all entities as multilayered complexes, which are constituted by their relationships to other complexes. Instead of trying to distinguish external relations from internal ones, we should be looking at the level of constitution. All relations are constitutive, in Ryder’s view, but some relations are more constitutive of a complex than others. What follows is an emergent view of reality: more complex complexes—mind, culture—emerge from the interaction between simpler complexes, but cannot be reduced to them.
知识、艺术与权力:约翰·莱德《经验理论》提纲(书评)
不要被字幕骗了。《概要》对莱德的书的描述太过谦虚,因为它在广泛实用的自然主义框架下,对经验进行了有趣而精心的描述。作者提到约翰·杜威的美学经验的概念作为他的主要背景灵感,他的分析在作品的美学部分是最好的,这绝不是诋毁其他主要部分的优点,这些部分以有趣的方式处理经验的认知和政治维度。事实上,莱德的书是近年来实用主义美学传统中最重要的文本之一,每个有兴趣在杜威的“作为经验的艺术”精神中追求美学的人都应该发现它是一本有趣的读物。杜威yan认为体验是一种与环境的互动,最近在具体化(Shusterman, Johnson)和行动主义(Rowlands, Noë)方面的研究证实了这一点,这是Ryder体验方法的基础。然而,他认为这些更现代的观点缺乏适当的本体论基础,赖德试图用他称之为“有序本体论”的立场来建立这种基础。这种本体将所有实体视为多层复合体,这些复合体是由它们与其他复合体的关系构成的。我们不应该试图区分外部关系和内部关系,而应该从宪法的层面来看待。在莱德看来,所有的关系都是构成的,但有些关系比其他关系更能构成综合体。随之而来的是一种涌现的现实观:更复杂的综合体——思想、文化——从更简单的综合体之间的相互作用中产生,但不能被简化为它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society has been the premier peer-reviewed journal specializing in the history of American philosophy since its founding in 1965. Although named for the founder of American pragmatism, American philosophers of all schools and periods, from the colonial to the recent past, are extensively discussed. TCSPS regularly includes essays, and every significant book published in the field is discussed in a review essay. A subscription to the journal includes membership in the Charles S. Peirce Society, which was founded in 1946 by Frederic H. Young. The purpose of the Society is to encourage study of and communication about the work of Peirce and its ongoing influence in the many fields of intellectual endeavor to which he contributed.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信