Smoking cessation counseling decision aid with E-cigarette information: A feasibility test

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
S. Strayer, R. Salloum, Jennifer H. LeLaurin, Christy Kollath-Cattano, Allie M. Kellner, J. Thrasher
{"title":"Smoking cessation counseling decision aid with E-cigarette information: A feasibility test","authors":"S. Strayer, R. Salloum, Jennifer H. LeLaurin, Christy Kollath-Cattano, Allie M. Kellner, J. Thrasher","doi":"10.1370/afm.20.s1.2924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: E-cigarette use has been increasing rapidly, most prominently among adult smokers. Smokers are more likely to use e-cigarettes to help them quit smoking than FDA-recommended methods (e.g., nicotine replacement therapy or prescription medications). Since at least 70% of smokers visit their physician annually, clinical encounters in primary care present a critical opportunity to provide smokers with evidence-based information about e-cigarettes. Objective: Enhance a previously developed prototype decision aid (DA) for smoking cessation counseling in primary care settings incorporating messages based on the behavior change approach of Motivational Interviewing (MI) and conduct focus groups physicians to further refine and inform the design of the enhanced DA. Study Design: Qualitative study. Setting or Dataset: Health system primary care practices. Population studied: Board-certified primary care physicians, PGY2 or 3 residents, nurse practitioners and physician assistants (N=10). Outcome Measures: Develop an enhanced smoking cessation DA incorporating MI-based content. Results: While most participants had formal training in MI techniques during residency, and sometimes used it for smoking cessation counseling, some still found it challenging to engage smokers in discussions about smoking cessation when they did not want to quit (i.e., precontemplation stage). Physicians acknowledged that time constraints and competing priorities (i.e., patient comorbidities) sometimes limited their ability to use MI techniques. Most physicians were familiar with DAs, although prior experience using them in practice was lacking, and only one participant had used them with patients. Physicians in both focus groups expressed interest in using the DA with patients and commented that it had the potential to improve cessation counseling by spending time building off DA content and getting into the “real work” of smoking cessation and employing MI techniques, rather than focusing on “standard” questions that would have already been answered in the DA. Conclusions: An MI-based","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: E-cigarette use has been increasing rapidly, most prominently among adult smokers. Smokers are more likely to use e-cigarettes to help them quit smoking than FDA-recommended methods (e.g., nicotine replacement therapy or prescription medications). Since at least 70% of smokers visit their physician annually, clinical encounters in primary care present a critical opportunity to provide smokers with evidence-based information about e-cigarettes. Objective: Enhance a previously developed prototype decision aid (DA) for smoking cessation counseling in primary care settings incorporating messages based on the behavior change approach of Motivational Interviewing (MI) and conduct focus groups physicians to further refine and inform the design of the enhanced DA. Study Design: Qualitative study. Setting or Dataset: Health system primary care practices. Population studied: Board-certified primary care physicians, PGY2 or 3 residents, nurse practitioners and physician assistants (N=10). Outcome Measures: Develop an enhanced smoking cessation DA incorporating MI-based content. Results: While most participants had formal training in MI techniques during residency, and sometimes used it for smoking cessation counseling, some still found it challenging to engage smokers in discussions about smoking cessation when they did not want to quit (i.e., precontemplation stage). Physicians acknowledged that time constraints and competing priorities (i.e., patient comorbidities) sometimes limited their ability to use MI techniques. Most physicians were familiar with DAs, although prior experience using them in practice was lacking, and only one participant had used them with patients. Physicians in both focus groups expressed interest in using the DA with patients and commented that it had the potential to improve cessation counseling by spending time building off DA content and getting into the “real work” of smoking cessation and employing MI techniques, rather than focusing on “standard” questions that would have already been answered in the DA. Conclusions: An MI-based
电子烟信息辅助戒烟咨询决策的可行性检验
背景:电子烟的使用一直在迅速增加,尤其是在成年吸烟者中。吸烟者更有可能使用电子烟来帮助他们戒烟,而不是fda推荐的方法(如尼古丁替代疗法或处方药)。由于每年至少有70%的吸烟者去看医生,初级保健的临床就诊为吸烟者提供了一个重要的机会,可以向他们提供有关电子烟的循证信息。目的:增强先前开发的用于初级保健机构戒烟咨询的决策辅助(DA)原型,将基于动机性访谈(MI)的行为改变方法的信息纳入其中,并通过焦点小组医生进一步完善和告知增强DA的设计。研究设计:定性研究。设置或数据集:卫生系统初级保健实践。研究人群:委员会认证的初级保健医生,PGY2或3住院医师,执业护士和医师助理(N=10)。结果测量:开发一个包含基于mi内容的强化戒烟DA。结果:虽然大多数参与者在住院医师期间接受过MI技术的正式培训,有时也将其用于戒烟咨询,但一些人仍然发现,当吸烟者不想戒烟时(即预考虑阶段),让他们参与戒烟的讨论是一项挑战。医生承认,时间限制和优先事项的竞争(即患者合并症)有时限制了他们使用心肌梗死技术的能力。大多数医生都熟悉DAs,尽管缺乏在实践中使用它们的经验,而且只有一名参与者对患者使用过它们。两个焦点小组的医生都表达了对患者使用DA的兴趣,并评论说,通过花时间构建DA的内容,进入戒烟的“实际工作”和使用MI技术,而不是专注于DA中已经回答的“标准”问题,它有可能改善戒烟咨询。结论:以mi为基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信