Automation of slice thickness measurements in computed tomography images of AAPM CT performance phantom using a non-rotational method

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Angelita D Ximenes, C. Anam, E. Hidayanto, A. Naufal, D. A. Rukmana, G. Dougherty
{"title":"Automation of slice thickness measurements in computed tomography images of AAPM CT performance phantom using a non-rotational method","authors":"Angelita D Ximenes, C. Anam, E. Hidayanto, A. Naufal, D. A. Rukmana, G. Dougherty","doi":"10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: The current study proposes a method for automatically measuring slice thickness using a non-rotational method on the middle stair object of the AAPM CT performance phantom image. Method: The AAPM CT performance phantom was scanned by a GE Healthcare 128-slice CT scanner with nominal slice thicknesses of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. The automated slice thickness was measured as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the profile of the middle stair object using a non-rotational method. The non-rotational method avoided rotating the image of the phantom. Instead, the lines to make the profiles were automatically rotated to confirm the stair’s location and rotation. The results of this non-rotational method were compared with those from a previous rotational method. Results: The slice thicknesses from the non-rotational method were 1.55, 1.86, 3.27, 4.86, 6.58, 7.57, and 9.66 mm for nominal slice thicknesses of 0.625, 1.25, 2.4, 3.75, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm, respectively. By comparison, the slice thicknesses from the rotational method were 1.53, 1.87, 3.32, 4.98, 6.77, 7.75, and 9.80 mm, respectively. The results of the nonrotational method were slightly lower (i.e. 0.25%) than the results of the rotational method for each nominal slice thickness, except for the smallest slice thickness. Conclusions: An alternative algorithm using a non-rotational method to measure the slice thickness of the middle stair object in the AAPM CT performance phantom was successfully implemented. The slice thicknesses from the nonrotational method results were slightly lower than the rotational method results for each nominal slice thickness, except at the smallest nominal slice thickness (0.625 mm).","PeriodicalId":53955,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"133 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The current study proposes a method for automatically measuring slice thickness using a non-rotational method on the middle stair object of the AAPM CT performance phantom image. Method: The AAPM CT performance phantom was scanned by a GE Healthcare 128-slice CT scanner with nominal slice thicknesses of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. The automated slice thickness was measured as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the profile of the middle stair object using a non-rotational method. The non-rotational method avoided rotating the image of the phantom. Instead, the lines to make the profiles were automatically rotated to confirm the stair’s location and rotation. The results of this non-rotational method were compared with those from a previous rotational method. Results: The slice thicknesses from the non-rotational method were 1.55, 1.86, 3.27, 4.86, 6.58, 7.57, and 9.66 mm for nominal slice thicknesses of 0.625, 1.25, 2.4, 3.75, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm, respectively. By comparison, the slice thicknesses from the rotational method were 1.53, 1.87, 3.32, 4.98, 6.77, 7.75, and 9.80 mm, respectively. The results of the nonrotational method were slightly lower (i.e. 0.25%) than the results of the rotational method for each nominal slice thickness, except for the smallest slice thickness. Conclusions: An alternative algorithm using a non-rotational method to measure the slice thickness of the middle stair object in the AAPM CT performance phantom was successfully implemented. The slice thicknesses from the nonrotational method results were slightly lower than the rotational method results for each nominal slice thickness, except at the smallest nominal slice thickness (0.625 mm).
非旋转方法在AAPM CT性能虚影计算机断层图像中自动测量层厚
摘要目的:本研究提出了一种采用非旋转方法对AAPM CT性能虚像中间台阶物体自动测量切片厚度的方法。方法:采用GE Healthcare 128层CT扫描AAPM CT表现体,标称层厚分别为0.625、1.25、2.5、3.75、5、7.5和10 mm。自动切片厚度采用非旋转方法测量中间楼梯物体轮廓的半最大全宽度(FWHM)。非旋转方法避免了幻像的旋转。相反,用于制作轮廓的线条被自动旋转,以确认楼梯的位置和旋转。将非旋转方法的结果与先前旋转方法的结果进行了比较。结果:非旋转法获得的切片厚度分别为1.55、1.86、3.27、4.86、6.58、7.57、9.66 mm,标称切片厚度分别为0.625、1.25、2.4、3.75、5、7.5、10 mm。相比之下,旋转法的切片厚度分别为1.53、1.87、3.32、4.98、6.77、7.75和9.80 mm。除了最小的切片厚度外,非旋转方法的结果略低于旋转方法的结果(即0.25%)。结论:采用非旋转方法测量AAPM CT表现虚像中楼梯物体切片厚度的替代算法已成功实现。除了最小的公称切片厚度(0.625 mm)外,非旋转法所得切片厚度在各公称切片厚度上均略低于旋转法所得切片厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering (PJMPE) (Online ISSN: 1898-0309; Print ISSN: 1425-4689) is an official publication of the Polish Society of Medical Physics. It is a peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal with no publication fees. The issues are published quarterly online. The Journal publishes original contribution in medical physics and biomedical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信