Rwanda: Lessons from Applied Intergovernmental Fiscal Equalization Formula

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
L. L. Shirima
{"title":"Rwanda: Lessons from Applied Intergovernmental Fiscal Equalization Formula","authors":"L. L. Shirima","doi":"10.37391/IJBMR.080402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a well-known fact that budgetary allocations need to be based on a just formula for balanced service delivery in the modern world. This paper describes the intergovernmental formula designed for Rwanda in 2003 to allocate grants from the central to local governments (LGs). First, the previous criterion, the Local Authority Budget Support Fund, was reviewed. This was followed by a literature review and field visits. Finally, the specifications of the mathematical model are described, followed by the proxy selection, data analysis, econometric evaluation, and estimations used in the study.\nIn 2003, data analysis revealed that LGs had low fiscal capacities and ubiquitous fiscal needs. These were proxied by mean own source revenues and expenditure needs, respectively, in the proposed formula. The difference between the two was taken as the mean fiscal gap. \nThis formula corrected the inherent weaknesses in the previous transfer system. It proposed weighting parameters to determine subnational transfer entitlements. Additionally, it constructed and applied welfare poverty and fiscal gap indices that captured the behavior of LGs in terms of wellbeing, fiscal needs, and revenue capacity for the first time in Rwanda. \nThe study recommendations were entirely adopted by the government. The formula was used to allocate unconditional grants from the central government to LGs to improve service delivery and reduce poverty. The study also highlights that any successful transfer formula design depends on how the following are determined—the transfer pool, weights, proposed variables, and proxy indices—and how they enter the model.","PeriodicalId":37927,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37391/IJBMR.080402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that budgetary allocations need to be based on a just formula for balanced service delivery in the modern world. This paper describes the intergovernmental formula designed for Rwanda in 2003 to allocate grants from the central to local governments (LGs). First, the previous criterion, the Local Authority Budget Support Fund, was reviewed. This was followed by a literature review and field visits. Finally, the specifications of the mathematical model are described, followed by the proxy selection, data analysis, econometric evaluation, and estimations used in the study. In 2003, data analysis revealed that LGs had low fiscal capacities and ubiquitous fiscal needs. These were proxied by mean own source revenues and expenditure needs, respectively, in the proposed formula. The difference between the two was taken as the mean fiscal gap. This formula corrected the inherent weaknesses in the previous transfer system. It proposed weighting parameters to determine subnational transfer entitlements. Additionally, it constructed and applied welfare poverty and fiscal gap indices that captured the behavior of LGs in terms of wellbeing, fiscal needs, and revenue capacity for the first time in Rwanda. The study recommendations were entirely adopted by the government. The formula was used to allocate unconditional grants from the central government to LGs to improve service delivery and reduce poverty. The study also highlights that any successful transfer formula design depends on how the following are determined—the transfer pool, weights, proposed variables, and proxy indices—and how they enter the model.
卢旺达:应用政府间财政均衡公式的经验教训
一个众所周知的事实是,预算分配必须以现代世界平衡提供服务的公正公式为基础。本文描述了2003年为卢旺达设计的政府间公式,用于从中央向地方政府(LGs)分配赠款。首先,审查了以前的标准,即地方当局预算支助基金。随后进行了文献综述和实地考察。最后,描述了数学模型的规范,然后是代理选择,数据分析,计量经济评估和研究中使用的估计。2003年的数据分析显示,地方政府财政能力较低,财政需求普遍存在。在拟议的公式中,这些分别以平均来源收入和支出需要代替。两者之差被视为平均财政缺口。这个公式纠正了以前转会系统的固有弱点。它提出了加权参数来确定次国家转移支付权利。此外,它还构建并应用了福利贫困和财政差距指数,该指数首次在卢旺达从福利、财政需求和收入能力方面反映了地方政府的行为。这项研究的建议完全被政府采纳。该公式用于从中央政府向地方政府无条件拨款,以改善服务提供和减少贫困。该研究还强调,任何成功的转移公式设计都取决于如何确定以下因素——转移池、权重、提议的变量和代理指标——以及它们如何进入模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Management and Business Research
International Journal of Management and Business Research Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Journal of Management and Business Research (IJMBR) is a scholarly, referred, peer reviewed publication of Graduate School of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, IAU in Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信