Latent class models for cross-national comparisons: the association between individual and national-level fertility and partnership characteristics

Mark Lyons-Amos
{"title":"Latent class models for cross-national comparisons: the association between individual and national-level fertility and partnership characteristics","authors":"Mark Lyons-Amos","doi":"10.18063/IJPS.2016.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multilevel modelling techniques such as random models or fixed effect are increasingly used in social sciences and demography to both account for clustering within higher level aggregations and evaluate the interaction between individual and contextual information. While this is justifiable in some studies, the extension of multilevel models to national level analysis — and particularly cross-national comparative analysis — is problematic and can hamper the understanding of the interplay between individual and country level characteristics. This paper proposes an alternative approach, which allocates countries to classes based on economic, labour market and policy characteristics. Classes influence the profiles of three key demographic behaviours at a sub-national level: marriage, cohabitation and first birth timing. Woman level data are drawn from a subset of the Harmonized Histories dataset, and national level information from the GGP contextual database. In this example, three country classes are extracted reflecting two Western patterns and an Eastern pattern, divided approximately along the Hajnal line. While Western countries tend to exhibit higher levels of family allowances albeit accounting for a lower share of spending which is associated with lower marriage and later fertility, Eastern countries generally show a higher share of spending but at lower absolute levels with lower cohabitation rates and early fertility.","PeriodicalId":85601,"journal":{"name":"Sudan journal of population studies","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudan journal of population studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18063/IJPS.2016.02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multilevel modelling techniques such as random models or fixed effect are increasingly used in social sciences and demography to both account for clustering within higher level aggregations and evaluate the interaction between individual and contextual information. While this is justifiable in some studies, the extension of multilevel models to national level analysis — and particularly cross-national comparative analysis — is problematic and can hamper the understanding of the interplay between individual and country level characteristics. This paper proposes an alternative approach, which allocates countries to classes based on economic, labour market and policy characteristics. Classes influence the profiles of three key demographic behaviours at a sub-national level: marriage, cohabitation and first birth timing. Woman level data are drawn from a subset of the Harmonized Histories dataset, and national level information from the GGP contextual database. In this example, three country classes are extracted reflecting two Western patterns and an Eastern pattern, divided approximately along the Hajnal line. While Western countries tend to exhibit higher levels of family allowances albeit accounting for a lower share of spending which is associated with lower marriage and later fertility, Eastern countries generally show a higher share of spending but at lower absolute levels with lower cohabitation rates and early fertility.
跨国比较的潜在阶级模型:个人和国家层面生育和伙伴关系特征之间的关联
随机模型或固定效应等多层次建模技术越来越多地用于社会科学和人口学,既可以解释更高层次聚集中的聚类,也可以评估个人信息和上下文信息之间的相互作用。虽然这在一些研究中是合理的,但将多层模型扩展到国家一级的分析- -特别是跨国比较分析- -是有问题的,可能妨碍对个人和国家一级特征之间相互作用的理解。本文提出了另一种方法,即根据经济、劳动力市场和政策特征将国家划分为不同的阶级。在次国家一级,阶级影响着三个关键人口行为的概况:婚姻、同居和首次生育时间。妇女层面的数据来自统一历史数据集的一个子集,而国家层面的信息则来自GGP上下文数据库。在本例中,提取了三个国家类,反映了两个西方模式和一个东方模式,大致沿着Hajnal线划分。虽然西方国家往往表现出较高水平的家庭津贴,但在支出中所占的份额较低,这与较低的结婚率和较晚的生育率有关,东方国家通常表现出较高的支出份额,但绝对水平较低,同居率较低,生育率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信