Estimating the Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions of COVID-19 in Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal

Narendra Chanda, Khagendra Adhikari, Ramesh Gautam, A. Pokharel, K. N. Uprety
{"title":"Estimating the Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions of COVID-19 in Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal","authors":"Narendra Chanda, Khagendra Adhikari, Ramesh Gautam, A. Pokharel, K. N. Uprety","doi":"10.3126/jist.v28i1.49044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to ongoing viral evolution and frequent outbreaks, responding to the pandemic has been challenging for countries with limited resources, like Nepal. In this study, we retrospectively estimated the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in Sudurpashchim province of Nepal using COVID-19 second wave data (20 March-31 August 2021) by using the mathematical model. We estimated extremely low (2%) detection of new cases in Sudurpashchim, and only 10% border screening with Antigen tests among the returnees in Sudurpashchim from India during the Delta surge which was not sufficient to lower the burden of the pandemic. The lockdown implemented during the pandemic was successful in lowering the disease burden. The control interventions were effective which reduced the 34% of new cases and 28% of active cases during the peak time and overall cases by 12.3% from 20 March-31 August 2021. During the peak of the pandemic, control intervention reduced the number of patients in regular beds by 27%, ICU by  31%, and ventilators admissions each by   33%. Our results explore that, without sufficient detection of new cases in the community, border screening alone is not sufficient for the diseases control. Therefore, in the absence of pharmaceutical interventions, it is important to combine social distance with adequate case detection, which is made even more effective by perfect border screening, to reduce the burden of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":16072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v28i1.49044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to ongoing viral evolution and frequent outbreaks, responding to the pandemic has been challenging for countries with limited resources, like Nepal. In this study, we retrospectively estimated the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in Sudurpashchim province of Nepal using COVID-19 second wave data (20 March-31 August 2021) by using the mathematical model. We estimated extremely low (2%) detection of new cases in Sudurpashchim, and only 10% border screening with Antigen tests among the returnees in Sudurpashchim from India during the Delta surge which was not sufficient to lower the burden of the pandemic. The lockdown implemented during the pandemic was successful in lowering the disease burden. The control interventions were effective which reduced the 34% of new cases and 28% of active cases during the peak time and overall cases by 12.3% from 20 March-31 August 2021. During the peak of the pandemic, control intervention reduced the number of patients in regular beds by 27%, ICU by  31%, and ventilators admissions each by   33%. Our results explore that, without sufficient detection of new cases in the community, border screening alone is not sufficient for the diseases control. Therefore, in the absence of pharmaceutical interventions, it is important to combine social distance with adequate case detection, which is made even more effective by perfect border screening, to reduce the burden of the pandemic.
估计尼泊尔苏杜尔帕西姆省COVID-19非药物干预措施的效果
由于病毒不断演变和频繁爆发,应对大流行对尼泊尔等资源有限的国家来说是一项挑战。在本研究中,我们使用数学模型,利用2019冠状病毒病第二波数据(2021年3月20日至8月31日)回顾性估计了尼泊尔苏德尔帕什钦省非药物干预措施(npi)的影响。我们估计,在三角洲疫情激增期间,sudurpashhim的新病例检出率极低(2%),在从印度返回sudurpashhim的人员中,只有10%的人进行了抗原检测边境筛查,这不足以降低大流行的负担。大流行期间实施的封锁成功地降低了疾病负担。控制干预措施是有效的,从2021年3月20日至8月31日,高峰期间新发病例减少34%,活跃病例减少28%,总病例减少12.3%。在大流行高峰期,控制干预措施使普通病床的患者人数减少了27%,ICU减少了31%,呼吸机入院人数减少了33%。我们的研究结果表明,在没有充分发现社区新病例的情况下,仅靠边境筛查不足以控制疾病。因此,在没有药物干预措施的情况下,重要的是将社会距离与充分的病例发现结合起来,通过完善的边境筛查使其更加有效,以减轻大流行病的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信