Analyzing polysemiosis: language, gesture, and depiction in two cultural practices with sand drawing

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Semiotica Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1515/sem-2022-0102
J. Zlatev, Simon Devylder, Rebecca Defina, Kalina Moskaluk, Linea Brink Andersen
{"title":"Analyzing polysemiosis: language, gesture, and depiction in two cultural practices with sand drawing","authors":"J. Zlatev, Simon Devylder, Rebecca Defina, Kalina Moskaluk, Linea Brink Andersen","doi":"10.1515/sem-2022-0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Human communication is by default polysemiotic: it involves the spontaneous combination of two or more semiotic systems, the most important ones being language, gesture, and depiction. We formulate an original cognitive-semiotic framework for the analysis of polysemiosis, contrasting this with more familiar systems based on the ambiguous term “multimodality.” To be fully explicit, we developed a coding system for the analysis of polysemiotic utterances containing speech, gesture, and drawing, and implemented this in the ELAN video annotation software. We used this to analyze 23 video-recordings of sand drawing performances on Paama, Vanuatu and 20 sand stories of the Pitjantjatjara culture in Central Australia. Methodologically we used the conceptual-empirical loop of cognitive semiotics: our theoretical framework guided general considerations, such as distinguishing between the “tiers” of gesture and depiction, and the three kinds of semiotic grounds (iconic, indexical, symbolic), but the precise decisions on how to operationalize these were made only after extensive work with the material. We describe the coding system in detail and provide illustrative examples from the Paamese and Pitjantjatjara data, remarking on both similarities and differences in the polysemiosis of the two cultural practices. We conclude by summarizing the contributions of the study and point to some directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":47288,"journal":{"name":"Semiotica","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semiotica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2022-0102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Human communication is by default polysemiotic: it involves the spontaneous combination of two or more semiotic systems, the most important ones being language, gesture, and depiction. We formulate an original cognitive-semiotic framework for the analysis of polysemiosis, contrasting this with more familiar systems based on the ambiguous term “multimodality.” To be fully explicit, we developed a coding system for the analysis of polysemiotic utterances containing speech, gesture, and drawing, and implemented this in the ELAN video annotation software. We used this to analyze 23 video-recordings of sand drawing performances on Paama, Vanuatu and 20 sand stories of the Pitjantjatjara culture in Central Australia. Methodologically we used the conceptual-empirical loop of cognitive semiotics: our theoretical framework guided general considerations, such as distinguishing between the “tiers” of gesture and depiction, and the three kinds of semiotic grounds (iconic, indexical, symbolic), but the precise decisions on how to operationalize these were made only after extensive work with the material. We describe the coding system in detail and provide illustrative examples from the Paamese and Pitjantjatjara data, remarking on both similarities and differences in the polysemiosis of the two cultural practices. We conclude by summarizing the contributions of the study and point to some directions for future research.
用沙画分析两种文化习俗中的语言、手势和描绘
人类交流是默认的多符号:它涉及两个或多个符号系统的自发组合,其中最重要的是语言、手势和描述。我们制定了一个原始的认知符号学框架来分析多义症,并将其与基于模糊术语“多模态”的更熟悉的系统进行对比。为了充分明确,我们开发了一个编码系统,用于分析包含语音、手势和绘图的多义词话语,并在ELAN视频注释软件中实现了这一系统。我们用它来分析23个在帕马、瓦努阿图的沙画表演录像和澳大利亚中部Pitjantjatjara文化的20个沙故事。在方法上,我们使用了认知符号学的概念-经验循环:我们的理论框架指导了一般的考虑,例如区分手势和描述的“层次”,以及三种符号学依据(标志性的,指标性的,象征性的),但关于如何操作这些的精确决定只有在对材料进行了广泛的研究之后才能做出。我们详细描述了编码系统,并从Paamese和Pitjantjatjara的数据中提供了说明性的例子,评论了两种文化实践中多义词的异同。最后,对本文的研究成果进行了总结,并对今后的研究方向进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Semiotica
Semiotica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
37.50%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Semiotica, the Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, founded in 1969, appears in five volumes of four issues per year, in two languages (English and French), and occasionally in German. Semiotica features articles reporting results of research in all branches of semiotic studies, in-depth reviews of selected current literature in this field, and occasional guest editorials and reports. From time to time, Special Issues, devoted to topics of particular interest, are assembled by Guest Editors. The publishers of Semiotica offer an annual prize, the Mouton d"Or, to the author of the best article each year. The article is selected by an independent international jury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信