John Locke. Adversaria Theologica 94

Q3 Arts and Humanities
A. A. Yakovlev
{"title":"John Locke. Adversaria Theologica 94","authors":"A. A. Yakovlev","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-82-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following is the Russian translation of several notes put down by John Locke after 1694 in his notebook named “Adversaria Theologica 94”. These notes allow a clearer view of the evolution of Locke’s theological standing and make more certain his design to write a treatise on soteriology containing polemics with John Biddle and Jean Calvin. More positive ideas are rooted in Locke’s mortalism and his Biblical hermeneutics. The concept of mortalism, sometimes named materialism in XVII century, presupposes that death takes the whole man, not only his body, and consequently the whole man is what to be raised, though in a changed state. Locke also introduces a new mode of argumentation relying on paraphrasing the texts of the Bible, primarily Epistles of St. Paul, and revealing the original sense of fundamental Biblical as well as philosophical notions. Locke suggests that matter is disposed to receive from God, if that be His wish, the faculties of perception and understanding or a substance with such faculties. This notion of disposition is also used in discussion of tabula rasa and ideas as primary matter of understanding after the Fall, and of restoration of Man to the state of ante lapsum.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-82-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following is the Russian translation of several notes put down by John Locke after 1694 in his notebook named “Adversaria Theologica 94”. These notes allow a clearer view of the evolution of Locke’s theological standing and make more certain his design to write a treatise on soteriology containing polemics with John Biddle and Jean Calvin. More positive ideas are rooted in Locke’s mortalism and his Biblical hermeneutics. The concept of mortalism, sometimes named materialism in XVII century, presupposes that death takes the whole man, not only his body, and consequently the whole man is what to be raised, though in a changed state. Locke also introduces a new mode of argumentation relying on paraphrasing the texts of the Bible, primarily Epistles of St. Paul, and revealing the original sense of fundamental Biblical as well as philosophical notions. Locke suggests that matter is disposed to receive from God, if that be His wish, the faculties of perception and understanding or a substance with such faculties. This notion of disposition is also used in discussion of tabula rasa and ideas as primary matter of understanding after the Fall, and of restoration of Man to the state of ante lapsum.
以下是约翰·洛克在1694年之后在他名为《神学论辩》的笔记本中写下的几个笔记的俄文翻译。这些笔记让我们对洛克神学立场的演变有了更清晰的认识,也让我们更确定他写救赎论论文的意图,其中包含了与约翰·比德尔和让·加尔文的论战。更积极的观点根植于洛克的死亡论和他的圣经解释学。死亡论的概念,有时在十七世纪被称为唯物主义,假设死亡带走了整个人,而不仅仅是他的身体,因此整个人是要复活的,虽然在一个改变的状态。洛克还介绍了一种新的论证模式,它依赖于对圣经文本的解释,主要是圣保罗的书信,并揭示了基本的圣经和哲学概念的原始意义。洛克认为,物质倾向于从上帝那里获得感知和理解的能力,如果这是上帝的意愿,或者具有这些能力的物质。这个意向的概念也被用于讨论白板和观念,作为理解堕落后的主要问题,以及人类恢复到堕落前的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Philosophy Quarterly
History of Philosophy Quarterly Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信