Fronto-ethmoidal fractures: A staging system and case series analysis

Francesco Carinci , Ilaria Zollino , Laura Arduin , Marcello Lapparelli , Michele Cavallo , Roberto Cenzi
{"title":"Fronto-ethmoidal fractures: A staging system and case series analysis","authors":"Francesco Carinci ,&nbsp;Ilaria Zollino ,&nbsp;Laura Arduin ,&nbsp;Marcello Lapparelli ,&nbsp;Michele Cavallo ,&nbsp;Roberto Cenzi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoms.2009.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fractures of fronto-ethmoidal bones (FEFs) are treated by a surgical team. A staging system for classifying FEFs is of paramount importance in order to plan surgery, to define prognosis and to exchange information among trauma centers. Some classifications are available but they are quite complex. Here a simple stage is proposed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five types of FEFs are possible: in situ FEF (without fragment dislocation, dura laceration or cerebrospinal fluid leak), type I (dislocated fracture involving the outer cortical bone, i.e. anterior frontal sinus wall), type II (dislocated fracture involving the inner cortical bone – i.e. posterior frontal sinus wall – and/or structures comprised in the diploe – i.e. the sinunasal tract), type III (dislocated FEF with dura laceration and cerebrospinal fluid leak), and type IV (i.e. comminuted fronto-ethmoid-orbital fractures). To evaluate the suitability of the proposed classification a retrospective study on a series of 42 patients was performed. Age, gender, stage, clinical diagnosis at admission, type of surgery and outcome were considered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A good correlation between the proposed classification and the studied variables was detected.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The proposed classification (that is a simplification of the Ioannides’ system) is a simple and precise method for staging FEFs. It can be used in daily practice. It is our understanding, however, that a multi-center study should be performed before the effectiveness of the proposed classification can be clearly stated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100128,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ajoms.2009.11.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S091569921000035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Fractures of fronto-ethmoidal bones (FEFs) are treated by a surgical team. A staging system for classifying FEFs is of paramount importance in order to plan surgery, to define prognosis and to exchange information among trauma centers. Some classifications are available but they are quite complex. Here a simple stage is proposed.

Methods

Five types of FEFs are possible: in situ FEF (without fragment dislocation, dura laceration or cerebrospinal fluid leak), type I (dislocated fracture involving the outer cortical bone, i.e. anterior frontal sinus wall), type II (dislocated fracture involving the inner cortical bone – i.e. posterior frontal sinus wall – and/or structures comprised in the diploe – i.e. the sinunasal tract), type III (dislocated FEF with dura laceration and cerebrospinal fluid leak), and type IV (i.e. comminuted fronto-ethmoid-orbital fractures). To evaluate the suitability of the proposed classification a retrospective study on a series of 42 patients was performed. Age, gender, stage, clinical diagnosis at admission, type of surgery and outcome were considered.

Results

A good correlation between the proposed classification and the studied variables was detected.

Conclusions

The proposed classification (that is a simplification of the Ioannides’ system) is a simple and precise method for staging FEFs. It can be used in daily practice. It is our understanding, however, that a multi-center study should be performed before the effectiveness of the proposed classification can be clearly stated.

额筛骨折:分期系统及病例系列分析
背景额筛骨骨折(FEFs)由外科团队治疗。对fef进行分类的分期系统对于计划手术、确定预后和在创伤中心之间交换信息至关重要。有些分类是可用的,但它们相当复杂。这里提出了一个简单的阶段。方法fef可分为五种类型:原位FEF(无碎片脱位、硬脑膜撕裂或脑脊液泄漏)、I型(脱位骨折累及外皮质骨,即额前窦壁)、II型(脱位骨折累及内皮质骨,即额后窦壁和/或构成双孔的结构,即鼻窦束)、III型(脱位FEF合并硬脑膜撕裂和脑脊液泄漏)和IV型(即粉碎性额-筛-眶骨折)。为了评估所提出的分类的适用性,对42例患者进行了回顾性研究。考虑患者的年龄、性别、分期、入院时的临床诊断、手术类型和预后。结果所提出的分类方法与所研究的变量具有良好的相关性。结论所提出的分类方法(即对Ioannides系统的简化)是一种简单、准确的fef分期方法。它可以在日常练习中使用。然而,我们的理解是,在明确提出的分类的有效性之前,应该进行多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信