Norwegian citizens' responses to influxes of asylum seekers: comparing across two refugee crises.

IF 1.8 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Social Influence Pub Date : 2023-08-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15534510.2023.2242619

Lise Bjånesøy, Hege H Bye

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared Norwegians' attitudes to immigration, perspective taking, and intergroup behaviors directed at asylum seekers in 2016 (Syrians and Afghans) and 2022 (Ukrainians). We find evidence for a stronger exclusionary response to the asylum seekers in 2016 than in 2022. Attitudes to immigration were more negative in 2016 than in 2022, and skepticism and avoiding asylum seekers was more common. However, the dominant behavior in both years was prosocial (greeting and donating) and Norwegians' willingness to take asylum seekers perspective was similar in 2016 and 2022. These results may reflect an absence of a symbolic threat in 2022 and may be connected to differences in the political rhetoric about asylum seekers in 2015/2016 and 2022.

查看原文本刊更多论文

挪威公民对寻求庇护者涌入的反应:两次难民危机的比较

我们比较了2016年(叙利亚人和阿富汗人)和2022年(乌克兰人)挪威人对移民的态度、视角和针对寻求庇护者的群体间行为。我们发现，2016年对寻求庇护者的排斥反应比2022年更强烈。2016年对移民的态度比2022年更为消极，怀疑和回避寻求庇护者更为普遍。然而，这两年的主导行为都是亲社会(问候和捐赠)，挪威人站在寻求庇护者角度的意愿在2016年和2022年是相似的。这些结果可能反映了2022年没有象征性的威胁，可能与2015/2016年和2022年关于寻求庇护者的政治言论的差异有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Influence PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Influence is a journal that provides an integrated focus for research into this important, dynamic, and multi-disciplinary field. Topics covered include: conformity, norms, social influence tactics such as norm of reciprocity, authority, scarcity, interpersonal influence, persuasion, power, advertising, mass media effects, political persuasion, propaganda, comparative influence, compliance, minority influence, influence in groups, cultic influence, social movements, social contagions, rumors, resistance to influence, influence across cultures, and the history of influence research.