The Rise of Neo-Illiberalism

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Krisis Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.21827/KRISIS.40.2.37158
Reijer P Hendrikse
{"title":"The Rise of Neo-Illiberalism","authors":"Reijer P Hendrikse","doi":"10.21827/KRISIS.40.2.37158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper expands on the notion neo-illiberalism, signifying a symbiosis between neoliberal capitalism and variegated illiberal nationalisms, offering deeper reflections on its geopolitics, key drivers, and conceptual puzzles. It is argued that the West has entered an age of political illiberalization, replicating political operating logics of variegated illiberal(izing) regimes elsewhere, corroding domestic institutions and the western-dominated international liberal order, constituting an historic geopolitical shift. Although centrist parties have been variably attracted to the far right, particularly seeing center-right parties reinvent themselves as nationalist challengers to the ‘globalist’ status quo, in power they mostly radicalize the neoliberal encasement of capital, transforming a range of liberal-democratic institutions, procedures, and rights into illiberal political fortifications. Neoliberalism’s illiberal mutation has been realized amidst the intersections of rampant financial offshoring and digitization defining contemporary capitalism, allowing billionaire-class factions to ‘hack’ liberal-democratic governments and operating systems. With the rollout of data-driven technologies increasingly requiring the rollback of liberal protections by design, the fusion of digitizing capitalism and illiberal nationalisms is increasingly escaping accepted notions of liberalism.","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"6 1","pages":"65-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/KRISIS.40.2.37158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper expands on the notion neo-illiberalism, signifying a symbiosis between neoliberal capitalism and variegated illiberal nationalisms, offering deeper reflections on its geopolitics, key drivers, and conceptual puzzles. It is argued that the West has entered an age of political illiberalization, replicating political operating logics of variegated illiberal(izing) regimes elsewhere, corroding domestic institutions and the western-dominated international liberal order, constituting an historic geopolitical shift. Although centrist parties have been variably attracted to the far right, particularly seeing center-right parties reinvent themselves as nationalist challengers to the ‘globalist’ status quo, in power they mostly radicalize the neoliberal encasement of capital, transforming a range of liberal-democratic institutions, procedures, and rights into illiberal political fortifications. Neoliberalism’s illiberal mutation has been realized amidst the intersections of rampant financial offshoring and digitization defining contemporary capitalism, allowing billionaire-class factions to ‘hack’ liberal-democratic governments and operating systems. With the rollout of data-driven technologies increasingly requiring the rollback of liberal protections by design, the fusion of digitizing capitalism and illiberal nationalisms is increasingly escaping accepted notions of liberalism.
新非自由主义的兴起
本文扩展了新非自由主义的概念,表明了新自由主义资本主义与各种非自由民族主义之间的共生关系,对其地缘政治、关键驱动因素和概念难题提供了更深入的思考。文章认为,西方已经进入了一个政治非自由化的时代,复制了其他地方各种非自由化政权的政治运作逻辑,侵蚀了国内制度和西方主导的国际自由秩序,构成了历史性的地缘政治转变。虽然中间派政党被极右翼所吸引,尤其是看到中右翼政党将自己重塑为“全球主义”现状的民族主义挑战者,但在执政期间,他们大多将资本的新自由主义包围激进化,将一系列自由民主制度、程序和权利转变为非自由主义的政治堡垒。新自由主义的非自由主义突变是在猖獗的金融离岸外包和定义当代资本主义的数字化的交叉点上实现的,允许亿万富翁阶级派系“入侵”自由民主政府和操作系统。随着数据驱动技术的推出,越来越多地要求自由主义保护措施的设计倒退,数字化资本主义和不自由的民族主义的融合越来越多地逃避了公认的自由主义观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Krisis
Krisis Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信