An institutional approach on the effects of diversification type

IF 1.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
J. Krug, C. Falaster
{"title":"An institutional approach on the effects of diversification type","authors":"J. Krug, C. Falaster","doi":"10.1108/mrjiam-07-2021-1192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn this study, the authors argue that there is more than meets the eye on the effects over postacquisition performance and diversification. This study aims to propose that the conditions that allow higher returns are dependent on the institutional context. The authors suggest that diversification strategies differ in their impact on postacquisition performance when moderated by the institutional inefficiencies of economies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research is based on a quantitative approach. The authors statistically test the hypotheses based on multiple regression analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nResults show a negative moderating effect of the institutional inefficiencies of the target country on the relationship between the diversification decisions of the firm and its postacquisition performance. So that Latin American firms that perform Cross-border acquisitions with higher degrees of diversification are related to worse performance. However, the degree of institutional inefficiencies negatively moderates this relation, attenuating the negative effects of diversification over performance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough past research has shown that economies with high institutional inefficiencies can benefit from higher levels of diversification, no study has considered the impact of the institutional inefficiencies when discussing many economies, to authors’ acknowledgment. The authors provide evidence that, in the case of Latin American firms, diversification reduces performance; however, the degree of institutional inefficiencies negatively moderates this relation.\n","PeriodicalId":45321,"journal":{"name":"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-07-2021-1192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose In this study, the authors argue that there is more than meets the eye on the effects over postacquisition performance and diversification. This study aims to propose that the conditions that allow higher returns are dependent on the institutional context. The authors suggest that diversification strategies differ in their impact on postacquisition performance when moderated by the institutional inefficiencies of economies. Design/methodology/approach This research is based on a quantitative approach. The authors statistically test the hypotheses based on multiple regression analysis. Findings Results show a negative moderating effect of the institutional inefficiencies of the target country on the relationship between the diversification decisions of the firm and its postacquisition performance. So that Latin American firms that perform Cross-border acquisitions with higher degrees of diversification are related to worse performance. However, the degree of institutional inefficiencies negatively moderates this relation, attenuating the negative effects of diversification over performance. Originality/value Although past research has shown that economies with high institutional inefficiencies can benefit from higher levels of diversification, no study has considered the impact of the institutional inefficiencies when discussing many economies, to authors’ acknowledgment. The authors provide evidence that, in the case of Latin American firms, diversification reduces performance; however, the degree of institutional inefficiencies negatively moderates this relation.
多元化类型效应的制度分析
目的在本研究中,作者认为对收购后绩效和多元化的影响远远超出了人们的视线。本研究旨在提出,允许更高回报的条件取决于制度背景。作者认为,多元化战略对收购后绩效的影响因经济体的制度效率低下而有所不同。设计/方法/方法这项研究是以定量方法为基础的。作者采用多元回归分析对假设进行统计检验。研究结果显示,目标国家的制度效率低下对公司多元化决策与其收购后绩效之间的关系具有负向调节作用。因此,拉丁美洲公司进行跨国收购时,多元化程度越高,其业绩越差。然而,制度效率低下的程度负向调节了这种关系,减弱了多样化对业绩的负面影响。原创性/价值虽然过去的研究表明,制度效率低下的经济体可以从更高水平的多元化中受益,但在讨论许多经济体时,没有研究考虑到制度效率低下的影响,这是作者承认的。作者提供的证据表明,以拉美公司为例,多元化降低了业绩;然而,制度效率低下的程度负向调节了这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Management Research welcomes papers, including cross-disciplinary work, on the following areas (but is not limited to): • Human Resource Management • Strategic Management • Organizational Behaviour • Organization Theory • Corporate Governance • Managerial Economics • Cross Cultural Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信