Struggling with Climate Change: Environmental Rights as Children’s Rights and the Potential of the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child

F. Ippolito
{"title":"Struggling with Climate Change: Environmental Rights as Children’s Rights and the Potential of the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child","authors":"F. Ippolito","doi":"10.3790/gyil.63.1.511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children are the least responsible for climate change, yet they will bear the greatest burden of its impact, and even if children have not been entirely neglected in environmental treaties, a comprehensive regime that extends environmental human rights to them is still absent. However, the Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC), which is the most ratified human rights instrument, is dedicated to children’s rights and is unique in specifically referring to the dangers and risks of environmental pollution. Based on this premise, this article contends that the CRC monitoring body has a unique institutional potential to interpret environmental law from a children’s rights-based perspective contributing to fighting climate change. A positive trend is evidently manifested in the General Comments and Concluding Observations that are moving from indirect considerations to explicit mainstreaming of climate change issues and related obligations. Following the entry into force of the Optional Protocol on a Communications Procedure (OPCP), which recognises that children have the right to appeal to an international mechanism specific to them, when national mechanisms fail to address violations effectively; the pending individual communication also promises to be historic in its scale of attempting to hold multiple countries simultaneously accountable for obligations under the CRC related to climate change. It is argued that a systemic integration of the Paris Agreement and the UNFCCC within the CRC context – as relevant rules of international law according to Article 31‍(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention – would ‘operationalise’ and make ‘justiciable’ those international environmental standards relevant to the substantive obligations under the CRC.","PeriodicalId":81610,"journal":{"name":"Jahrbuch fur internationales Recht. German yearbook of international law","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahrbuch fur internationales Recht. German yearbook of international law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children are the least responsible for climate change, yet they will bear the greatest burden of its impact, and even if children have not been entirely neglected in environmental treaties, a comprehensive regime that extends environmental human rights to them is still absent. However, the Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC), which is the most ratified human rights instrument, is dedicated to children’s rights and is unique in specifically referring to the dangers and risks of environmental pollution. Based on this premise, this article contends that the CRC monitoring body has a unique institutional potential to interpret environmental law from a children’s rights-based perspective contributing to fighting climate change. A positive trend is evidently manifested in the General Comments and Concluding Observations that are moving from indirect considerations to explicit mainstreaming of climate change issues and related obligations. Following the entry into force of the Optional Protocol on a Communications Procedure (OPCP), which recognises that children have the right to appeal to an international mechanism specific to them, when national mechanisms fail to address violations effectively; the pending individual communication also promises to be historic in its scale of attempting to hold multiple countries simultaneously accountable for obligations under the CRC related to climate change. It is argued that a systemic integration of the Paris Agreement and the UNFCCC within the CRC context – as relevant rules of international law according to Article 31‍(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention – would ‘operationalise’ and make ‘justiciable’ those international environmental standards relevant to the substantive obligations under the CRC.
与气候变化作斗争:环境权利作为儿童权利和联合国儿童权利公约的潜力
儿童对气候变化的责任最小,但他们将承受其影响的最大负担,即使环境条约没有完全忽视儿童,但仍然缺乏将环境人权扩大到儿童的全面制度。然而,《儿童权利公约》是批准最多的人权文书,它致力于儿童权利,并在具体提到环境污染的危险和风险方面是独特的。基于这一前提,本文认为《儿童权利公约》监督机构具有独特的制度潜力,可以从儿童权利的角度解释环境法,有助于应对气候变化。一般性意见和结论性意见明显显示出积极的趋势,即气候变化问题及其相关义务正从间接考虑转向明确主流化。《关于来文程序的任择议定书》生效后,该议定书承认,如果国家机制未能有效处理侵权行为,儿童有权向专门针对他们的国际机制提出上诉;即将进行的个人通报也有望在其规模上具有历史意义,因为它试图让多个国家同时对《儿童权利公约》规定的与气候变化有关的义务负责。有人认为,《巴黎协定》和《联合国气候变化框架公约》在《儿童权利公约》背景下的系统整合——作为《维也纳公约》第31条‍(3)(c)项规定的国际法相关规则——将使那些与《儿童权利公约》下的实质性义务相关的国际环境标准“可操作性”和“可诉性”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书