The effects of emotions on the generation of environmental arguments / Efectos de las emociones en la generación de argumentos sobre el medio ambiente natural

IF 0.7 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
M. Amérigo, J. A. García, Soledad López-Santiago
{"title":"The effects of emotions on the generation of environmental arguments / Efectos de las emociones en la generación de argumentos sobre el medio ambiente natural","authors":"M. Amérigo, J. A. García, Soledad López-Santiago","doi":"10.1080/21711976.2018.1432527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyses the effects of inducing emotions on thought-action repertoires related to nature following the Broaden-and-Build Theory (BBT). Based on a pilot study conducted with 279 university students, this study transculturally validated five videos that generated two positive, one neutral and two negative emotions. The main study, conducted with 300 Spanish university students, utilized experimental manipulation to ascertain whether videos that induced positive emotions increased the number of thought-action repertoires in comparison with the video that induced a neutral emotion. In the case of the negative videos, a significant discrepancy was observed in the number of repertoires generated depending on the type of emotion induced, with sadness generating a greater number than disgust. Furthermore, attitudes pertaining to affective bonds with nature increased thought-action repertoires, regardless of the emotion induced. The paper discusses the need to examine in greater depth the effect of different negative emotions on the generation of environmental arguments.","PeriodicalId":55641,"journal":{"name":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","volume":"39 1","pages":"204 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2018.1432527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyses the effects of inducing emotions on thought-action repertoires related to nature following the Broaden-and-Build Theory (BBT). Based on a pilot study conducted with 279 university students, this study transculturally validated five videos that generated two positive, one neutral and two negative emotions. The main study, conducted with 300 Spanish university students, utilized experimental manipulation to ascertain whether videos that induced positive emotions increased the number of thought-action repertoires in comparison with the video that induced a neutral emotion. In the case of the negative videos, a significant discrepancy was observed in the number of repertoires generated depending on the type of emotion induced, with sadness generating a greater number than disgust. Furthermore, attitudes pertaining to affective bonds with nature increased thought-action repertoires, regardless of the emotion induced. The paper discusses the need to examine in greater depth the effect of different negative emotions on the generation of environmental arguments.
情绪对环境争论产生的影响/情绪对自然环境争论产生的影响
摘要本文运用“扩建理论”分析了情绪诱导对与自然相关的思维-行动库的影响。基于对279名大学生进行的初步研究,这项研究跨文化地验证了五段视频,这些视频产生了两种积极情绪,一种中性情绪和两种消极情绪。主要的研究是对300名西班牙大学生进行的,他们利用实验操作来确定,与引发中性情绪的视频相比,引发积极情绪的视频是否会增加思想-行动动作的数量。在负面视频的情况下,根据引发的情绪类型,所产生的曲目数量存在显著差异,悲伤产生的曲目数量多于厌恶。此外,与自然的情感联系有关的态度增加了思想-行动库,而不考虑引起的情绪。本文讨论了更深入地研究不同负面情绪对环境论点产生的影响的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信