Appropriateness of diabetic down-referral letters to primary healthcare clinics in the uMgungundlovu district municipality of KwaZulu-Natal

IF 0.6 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
N. McGrath, S. Pillay
{"title":"Appropriateness of diabetic down-referral letters to primary healthcare clinics in the uMgungundlovu district municipality of KwaZulu-Natal","authors":"N. McGrath, S. Pillay","doi":"10.1080/16089677.2021.1928982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The majority of patients living with diabetes mellitus (PLWD) are diagnosed and managed at primary care level. Much research has focused on diabetes mellitus, its complications and the need for earlier referral from primary to higher levels of health care. Little research, however, has focused on down-referrals of PLWD. Methods: This study assessed whether down-referral letters of PLWD to primary healthcare clinics (PHCs) and community healthcare centres (CHCs) in the uMgungundlovu district of KwaZulu-Natal contained adequate information, were legible, had a follow-up plan and whether national guidelines were adhered to. Questionnaires were distributed to nurses and doctors working in PHCs and CHCs to assess their opinions of appropriateness of down-referrals of PLWD during November and December 2019. Results: A total of 127 referral letters and 55 questionnaires were assessed. Referral letter assessment revealed that 81.1% of PLWD had no glucose control and 85% had no renal function documented. Diabetic complications were recorded infrequently (3.94%). One-third (33.6%) of the PLWD over the age of 40 years were not down-referred on a statin while 6.3% were on a medication combination that was not in accordance with the South African Essential Medicines List. A significant number of referral letters had no clear management plan other than medications listed (96.1%), with no follow-up appointments documented (95.3%). Less than two-thirds (60%) of letters were easily legible. The most common down-referrals were from district hospitals (98.43%). Questionnaire respondents agreed that referral letters generally contained information on the patient’s medication and comorbidities but rarely contained information regarding glucose control or complications of diabetes, among which foot and eye complications were significantly omitted. Conclusion: Analysis of down-referral letters identified many omissions, in both clinical and biochemical data, that are needed by clinicians working at both CHCs and PHCs to optimally manage PLWD. It is imperative that findings of studies like this be used in developing intervention strategies targeting this level of diabetes care.","PeriodicalId":43919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","volume":"63 1","pages":"106 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2021.1928982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The majority of patients living with diabetes mellitus (PLWD) are diagnosed and managed at primary care level. Much research has focused on diabetes mellitus, its complications and the need for earlier referral from primary to higher levels of health care. Little research, however, has focused on down-referrals of PLWD. Methods: This study assessed whether down-referral letters of PLWD to primary healthcare clinics (PHCs) and community healthcare centres (CHCs) in the uMgungundlovu district of KwaZulu-Natal contained adequate information, were legible, had a follow-up plan and whether national guidelines were adhered to. Questionnaires were distributed to nurses and doctors working in PHCs and CHCs to assess their opinions of appropriateness of down-referrals of PLWD during November and December 2019. Results: A total of 127 referral letters and 55 questionnaires were assessed. Referral letter assessment revealed that 81.1% of PLWD had no glucose control and 85% had no renal function documented. Diabetic complications were recorded infrequently (3.94%). One-third (33.6%) of the PLWD over the age of 40 years were not down-referred on a statin while 6.3% were on a medication combination that was not in accordance with the South African Essential Medicines List. A significant number of referral letters had no clear management plan other than medications listed (96.1%), with no follow-up appointments documented (95.3%). Less than two-thirds (60%) of letters were easily legible. The most common down-referrals were from district hospitals (98.43%). Questionnaire respondents agreed that referral letters generally contained information on the patient’s medication and comorbidities but rarely contained information regarding glucose control or complications of diabetes, among which foot and eye complications were significantly omitted. Conclusion: Analysis of down-referral letters identified many omissions, in both clinical and biochemical data, that are needed by clinicians working at both CHCs and PHCs to optimally manage PLWD. It is imperative that findings of studies like this be used in developing intervention strategies targeting this level of diabetes care.
向夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省uMgungundlovu区初级保健诊所发送糖尿病转诊信的适当性
背景:大多数糖尿病(PLWD)患者是在初级保健水平诊断和治疗的。许多研究都集中在糖尿病、其并发症以及从初级保健到高级保健的早期转诊的必要性上。然而,很少有研究关注PLWD的下行转诊。方法:本研究评估了在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省uMgungundlovu地区,PLWD向初级卫生保健诊所(PHCs)和社区卫生保健中心(CHCs)的转诊信是否包含足够的信息,是否清晰,是否有后续计划,是否遵守国家指南。2019年11月至12月,向在初级保健院和初级保健院工作的护士和医生发放问卷,评估他们对PLWD下行转诊的适宜性的看法。结果:共评估转诊信127封,问卷55份。转诊信评估显示81.1%的PLWD患者没有血糖控制,85%的患者没有肾脏功能记录。糖尿病并发症发生率低(3.94%)。40岁以上的PLWD中,有三分之一(33.6%)的患者没有减少他汀类药物的使用,而6.3%的患者使用的药物组合不符合《南非基本药物清单》。大量的转诊信除了列出药物外没有明确的管理计划(96.1%),没有随访预约记录(95.3%)。只有不到三分之二(60%)的字母是容易辨认的。最常见的转诊是地区医院(98.43%)。问卷调查对象一致认为,转诊信一般包含患者的用药和合并症信息,但很少包含血糖控制或糖尿病并发症信息,其中足部和眼部并发症被明显省略。结论:对下转诊信的分析发现了临床和生化数据中的许多遗漏,这些遗漏是临床医生在CHCs和PHCs工作时需要的,以最佳地管理PLWD。像这样的研究结果必须用于制定针对这一水平的糖尿病护理的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信