Optimists' and pessimists' self-reported mental and global health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society Pub Date : 2021-01-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr.2021.102394
Inger Schou-Bredal, Tine Grimholt, Tore Bonsaksen, Laila Skogstad, Trond Heir, Øivind Ekeberg
{"title":"Optimists' and pessimists' self-reported mental and global health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway.","authors":"Inger Schou-Bredal, Tine Grimholt, Tore Bonsaksen, Laila Skogstad, Trond Heir, Øivind Ekeberg","doi":"10.5114/hpr.2021.102394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic represents a global health crisis. How well people cope with this situation depends on many factors, including one's personality, such as dispositional optimism. The aim of the study was to investigate: 1) optimists' and pessimists' concerns during lockdown, and mental and global health; 2) whether pessimists without known risk factors more often than optimists report being at risk for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>A snowball sampling strategy was used; 4,527 people, 18 years or older, participated in a survey on a variety of mental health conditions and COVID-19 worries. In addition, they completed the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R). Optimism was defined by LOT-R <i>f</i> ≥ 17.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fewer optimists than pessimists reported that they were worried about COVID-19, respectively 51.2% vs. 66.8%, <i>p</i> < .001. Among those reporting none of the known somatic risk factors, more pessimists than optimists (14.3% vs. 9.1%, <i>p</i> < .001) considered themselves at risk of a fatal outcome from COVID-19. Significantly fewer optimists reported that they had anxiety (5.1%), depression (3.4%), suicidal ideation (0.7%) and insomnia (19.3%) during the COVID-19 outbreak than pessimists (24.7% anxiety, 18.4% depression, 5.4% suicidal ideation, 39.8% insomnia, all <i>p</i> < .001). Optimists reported better global health than pessimists (87.2 vs. 84.6, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimists were generally less worried about the COVID-19 pandemic than pessimists and reported better mental and global health during lockdown. Pessimists more often than optimists reported being at risk for COVID-19 without reporting known risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":39760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501414/pdf/","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2021.102394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic represents a global health crisis. How well people cope with this situation depends on many factors, including one's personality, such as dispositional optimism. The aim of the study was to investigate: 1) optimists' and pessimists' concerns during lockdown, and mental and global health; 2) whether pessimists without known risk factors more often than optimists report being at risk for COVID-19.

Participants and procedure: A snowball sampling strategy was used; 4,527 people, 18 years or older, participated in a survey on a variety of mental health conditions and COVID-19 worries. In addition, they completed the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R). Optimism was defined by LOT-R f ≥ 17.

Results: Fewer optimists than pessimists reported that they were worried about COVID-19, respectively 51.2% vs. 66.8%, p < .001. Among those reporting none of the known somatic risk factors, more pessimists than optimists (14.3% vs. 9.1%, p < .001) considered themselves at risk of a fatal outcome from COVID-19. Significantly fewer optimists reported that they had anxiety (5.1%), depression (3.4%), suicidal ideation (0.7%) and insomnia (19.3%) during the COVID-19 outbreak than pessimists (24.7% anxiety, 18.4% depression, 5.4% suicidal ideation, 39.8% insomnia, all p < .001). Optimists reported better global health than pessimists (87.2 vs. 84.6, p < .001).

Conclusions: Optimists were generally less worried about the COVID-19 pandemic than pessimists and reported better mental and global health during lockdown. Pessimists more often than optimists reported being at risk for COVID-19 without reporting known risk factors.

挪威 COVID-19 大流行期间乐观主义者和悲观主义者自我报告的心理和全球健康状况。
背景:COVID-19 大流行是一场全球性的健康危机。人们应对这种情况的能力取决于很多因素,包括个人的性格,如性格乐观。本研究旨在调查:1)乐观主义者和悲观主义者在封锁期间的担忧以及心理和全球健康状况;2)没有已知风险因素的悲观主义者是否比乐观主义者更常报告自己有感染 COVID-19 的风险:采用滚雪球式抽样策略,4527 名 18 岁或以上的人参加了关于各种心理健康状况和 COVID-19 忧虑的调查。此外,他们还完成了生活取向测试修订版(LOT-R)。结果显示,LOT-R f≥17 为乐观:结果:与悲观主义者相比,乐观主义者表示担心 COVID-19 的人数较少,分别为 51.2% 对 66.8%,P < .001。在未报告任何已知躯体风险因素的人群中,认为自己有可能因 COVID-19 而死亡的悲观者多于乐观者(14.3% 对 9.1%,P < .001)。在 COVID-19 爆发期间,乐观者报告自己患有焦虑症(5.1%)、抑郁症(3.4%)、自杀倾向(0.7%)和失眠症(19.3%)的人数明显少于悲观者(焦虑症 24.7%、抑郁症 18.4%、自杀倾向 5.4%、失眠症 39.8%,均 p < .001)。与悲观主义者相比,乐观主义者的全球健康状况更好(87.2 vs. 84.6,p < .001):结论:与悲观主义者相比,乐观主义者对 COVID-19 大流行的担忧程度普遍较低,他们在封锁期间的心理和全球健康状况也较好。悲观主义者比乐观主义者更常在未报告已知风险因素的情况下报告自己有感染 COVID-19 的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: JBCS is a formal quarterly publication of the Brazilian Computer Society. It is a peer-reviewed international journal which aims to serve as a forum to disseminate innovative research in all fields of computer science and related subjects. Theoretical, practical and experimental papers reporting original research contributions are welcome, as well as high quality survey papers. The journal is open to contributions in all computer science topics, computer systems development or in formal and theoretical aspects of computing, as the list of topics below is not exhaustive. Contributions will be considered for publication in JBCS if they have not been published previously and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信