Negotiation of curricular policies-practices: teachers’ professional development oriented towards curricular decision-making

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Maria Lidelmar Carvalho de Melo, Lucinalva Andrade Ataide de Almeida, Carlinda Leite
{"title":"Negotiation of curricular policies-practices: teachers’ professional development oriented towards curricular decision-making","authors":"Maria Lidelmar Carvalho de Melo, Lucinalva Andrade Ataide de Almeida, Carlinda Leite","doi":"10.1590/1984-0411.87031-t","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims to highlight the possibilities and impossibilities of policies/programs negotiation processes to contribute to the teachers’ professional development oriented towards curricular decision-making. Using the defense of autonomy of the exercise of teaching enactment, it is considered that professional development permeates the idea of teachers constituting themselves as curricular decision-makers, understood as capacity for action that is developed from the articulation between individual efforts of the subject, available resources and contextual factors. The theoretical-methodological orientation is based on the unstable and undecidable relationship between particularity and universality. The locus of data collection on curricular policies/practices was the municipality of Caruaru, located in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil, with the material available on the Caruaru Platform Instituto Qualidade no Ensino (IQE) [Quality in Teaching Institute] and the IQE official website. The analysis of these materials shows disputes around the meaning of curricular policies/practices in this municipality built from the discourses of global educational reforms and national policies that have been proposing, through curricular standardization, the attempt to close the production of contextual curricular responses. However, despite these limitations, it is believed that there is a possibility for teachers to act in the structure gaps to dispute, along with policies, other meanings of teaching enactment that stimulate professional development based on autonomy and considering teaching knowledge.","PeriodicalId":45723,"journal":{"name":"Educar em Revista","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educar em Revista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0411.87031-t","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper aims to highlight the possibilities and impossibilities of policies/programs negotiation processes to contribute to the teachers’ professional development oriented towards curricular decision-making. Using the defense of autonomy of the exercise of teaching enactment, it is considered that professional development permeates the idea of teachers constituting themselves as curricular decision-makers, understood as capacity for action that is developed from the articulation between individual efforts of the subject, available resources and contextual factors. The theoretical-methodological orientation is based on the unstable and undecidable relationship between particularity and universality. The locus of data collection on curricular policies/practices was the municipality of Caruaru, located in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil, with the material available on the Caruaru Platform Instituto Qualidade no Ensino (IQE) [Quality in Teaching Institute] and the IQE official website. The analysis of these materials shows disputes around the meaning of curricular policies/practices in this municipality built from the discourses of global educational reforms and national policies that have been proposing, through curricular standardization, the attempt to close the production of contextual curricular responses. However, despite these limitations, it is believed that there is a possibility for teachers to act in the structure gaps to dispute, along with policies, other meanings of teaching enactment that stimulate professional development based on autonomy and considering teaching knowledge.
课程政策协商-实践:面向课程决策的教师专业发展
本文旨在强调政策/项目谈判过程的可能性和不可能性,以促进以课程决策为导向的教师专业发展。利用教学制定行使自主权的辩护,认为专业发展渗透了教师将自己视为课程决策者的理念,被理解为从主体的个人努力、可用资源和环境因素之间的衔接发展而来的行动能力。其理论方法论取向是基于特殊性与普遍性之间不稳定的、不可确定的关系。课程政策/实践的数据收集地点是位于巴西伯南布哥州的卡鲁鲁市,资料可在卡鲁鲁教学质量研究所(IQE)和IQE官方网站上找到。对这些材料的分析表明,围绕本市课程政策/实践的意义存在争议,这些争议源于全球教育改革的话语和国家政策,这些政策一直在提议,通过课程标准化,试图关闭情境课程反应的生产。然而,尽管存在这些限制,我们相信教师仍有可能在结构差距中采取行动,与政策、教学制定的其他意义一起,在自主和考虑教学知识的基础上促进专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educar em Revista
Educar em Revista EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信