A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE pH OF MAINSTREAM CIGARETTE SMOKE

C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt
{"title":"A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE pH OF MAINSTREAM CIGARETTE SMOKE","authors":"C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt","doi":"10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two methods used to determine the pH of mainstream cigarette smoke (MSCS) were compared to find the fastest and least complicated method. Both methods involved measuring the pH of only the water-soluble portion of the particulate fraction of MSCS. In method one, the pH of an aqueous extract of glass-fiber filter pads containing total particulate matter (TPM) was measured. In the second method, pH was measured directly from a glass fiber pad containing TPM that was moistened with 3 ml of degassed deionized water. Both methods were able to distinguish pH differences in the differently constructed reference cigarettes evaluated and were reproducible with relative standard deviations of less than 3%. Determination of smoke pH directly from a moistened glass fiber pad containing trapped TPM was found to be less complicated and quicker than determining pH of an aqueous extract due to the elimination of the extraction step.","PeriodicalId":10257,"journal":{"name":"中国烟草科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国烟草科学","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Two methods used to determine the pH of mainstream cigarette smoke (MSCS) were compared to find the fastest and least complicated method. Both methods involved measuring the pH of only the water-soluble portion of the particulate fraction of MSCS. In method one, the pH of an aqueous extract of glass-fiber filter pads containing total particulate matter (TPM) was measured. In the second method, pH was measured directly from a glass fiber pad containing TPM that was moistened with 3 ml of degassed deionized water. Both methods were able to distinguish pH differences in the differently constructed reference cigarettes evaluated and were reproducible with relative standard deviations of less than 3%. Determination of smoke pH directly from a moistened glass fiber pad containing trapped TPM was found to be less complicated and quicker than determining pH of an aqueous extract due to the elimination of the extraction step.
两种测定主流香烟烟气pH值方法的比较
摘要:比较了两种测定主流卷烟烟气pH值的方法,找出最快、最简单的方法。这两种方法都只测量MSCS颗粒部分的水溶性部分的pH值。方法一,测定含总颗粒物(TPM)的玻璃纤维滤垫水提物的pH值。在第二种方法中,直接从含有TPM的玻璃纤维垫上测量pH值,用3ml脱气去离子水湿润TPM。两种方法都能够区分不同结构的参考香烟的pH值差异,并且在相对标准偏差小于3%的情况下具有可重复性。由于消除了萃取步骤,直接从含有捕获TPM的潮湿玻璃纤维垫中测定烟雾pH值比测定水萃取物的pH值更简单和更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3722
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信