Commission, product quality and return policy in agency selling

L. Hsiao, Ying‐Ju Chen, Hui Xiong
{"title":"Commission, product quality and return policy in agency selling","authors":"L. Hsiao, Ying‐Ju Chen, Hui Xiong","doi":"10.1002/nav.22094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many sellers provide products for consumers directly on online platforms. This selling format is labeled “agency selling.” In this article, we investigate the platform's contract design and the seller's quality and return decisions in the agency selling. We find that the platform chooses a high commission rate to induce the seller to accept returns when the salvage factor is large enough or the consumers' willingness to pay for quality is sufficiently low. Compared to the direct channel, the seller is more likely to accept returns in the agency selling. Moreover, if the consumers' willingness to pay for quality increases, the platform intends to reduce the commission rate to induce the seller to increase the quality. The commission rate makes no influence on the generosity of the refund. However, when the consumers' willingness to pay for quality is sufficiently large, the platform prefers the seller to offer no refund and the commission rate may increase in the consumers' willingness to pay for quality. Finally, we consider two extensions: quality affects satisfaction probability and return window.","PeriodicalId":19120,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","volume":"1 1","pages":"231 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many sellers provide products for consumers directly on online platforms. This selling format is labeled “agency selling.” In this article, we investigate the platform's contract design and the seller's quality and return decisions in the agency selling. We find that the platform chooses a high commission rate to induce the seller to accept returns when the salvage factor is large enough or the consumers' willingness to pay for quality is sufficiently low. Compared to the direct channel, the seller is more likely to accept returns in the agency selling. Moreover, if the consumers' willingness to pay for quality increases, the platform intends to reduce the commission rate to induce the seller to increase the quality. The commission rate makes no influence on the generosity of the refund. However, when the consumers' willingness to pay for quality is sufficiently large, the platform prefers the seller to offer no refund and the commission rate may increase in the consumers' willingness to pay for quality. Finally, we consider two extensions: quality affects satisfaction probability and return window.
代理销售的佣金,产品质量和退货政策
许多卖家直接在网络平台上为消费者提供产品。这种销售形式被称为“代理销售”。在本文中,我们研究了代理销售中平台的合同设计和卖家的质量和退货决策。我们发现,当残值系数足够大或者消费者为质量付费的意愿足够低时,平台会选择较高的佣金率来诱导卖家接受退货。与直接渠道相比,在代理销售中,卖家更容易接受退货。此外,如果消费者为质量付费的意愿增加,平台打算降低佣金率,以诱导卖家提高质量。佣金率对退款的慷慨程度没有影响。然而,当消费者为质量付费的意愿足够大时,平台更倾向于卖家不退款,消费者为质量付费的意愿可能会增加佣金率。最后,我们考虑了两个扩展:质量影响满意概率和返回窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信