Universities and stakeholders: An historical organisational study of evolution and change towards a multi-helix model

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
John P. Wilson, Ronald Dyer, Stefan Cantore
{"title":"Universities and stakeholders: An historical organisational study of evolution and change towards a multi-helix model","authors":"John P. Wilson, Ronald Dyer, Stefan Cantore","doi":"10.1177/09504222231175425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research of the main university stakeholders has only been of a cross-sectional or short-term nature thereby limiting our understanding of how universities have evolved as a result of stakeholder influence. Indeed, neglect of stakeholders in strategic planning may result in both companies and universities becoming less successful and less competitive. For this reason, a temporal perspective was adopted to enable a consideration of events, their antecedents and subsequent effects thereby identifying emerging evolutionary trends and responding to them so that there can be appropriate decision making and accountability. This paper uses historical organisational studies to provide a longitudinal overview of internal and external stakeholder influence on university evolution and change from their foundations in the early Medieval period. Five university generations are described: Medieval, Humboldtian, Civic/Land Grant, Mass, and Stakeholder. This investigation reveals a number of strategic shifts in stakeholders as their voices have become increasingly prominent or have declined. Over time, the number of stakeholders have grown as their salience has been acknowledged through concepts such as the third mission; corporate social responsibility and helix structure; and, although some of the main stakeholders have remained constant such as learners and faculty, their influence has fluctuated.","PeriodicalId":46591,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Higher Education","volume":"225 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231175425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research of the main university stakeholders has only been of a cross-sectional or short-term nature thereby limiting our understanding of how universities have evolved as a result of stakeholder influence. Indeed, neglect of stakeholders in strategic planning may result in both companies and universities becoming less successful and less competitive. For this reason, a temporal perspective was adopted to enable a consideration of events, their antecedents and subsequent effects thereby identifying emerging evolutionary trends and responding to them so that there can be appropriate decision making and accountability. This paper uses historical organisational studies to provide a longitudinal overview of internal and external stakeholder influence on university evolution and change from their foundations in the early Medieval period. Five university generations are described: Medieval, Humboldtian, Civic/Land Grant, Mass, and Stakeholder. This investigation reveals a number of strategic shifts in stakeholders as their voices have become increasingly prominent or have declined. Over time, the number of stakeholders have grown as their salience has been acknowledged through concepts such as the third mission; corporate social responsibility and helix structure; and, although some of the main stakeholders have remained constant such as learners and faculty, their influence has fluctuated.
大学和利益相关者:对多螺旋模型的进化和变化的历史组织研究
对大学主要利益相关者的研究只是一个横向的或短期的性质,从而限制了我们对大学如何在利益相关者的影响下发展的理解。事实上,在战略规划中忽视利益相关者可能会导致公司和大学变得不那么成功,竞争力下降。出于这个原因,采用了一种时间视角来考虑事件、它们的前因和后续影响,从而确定新出现的进化趋势并对它们作出反应,以便作出适当的决策和问责制。本文利用历史组织研究,纵向概述了中世纪早期内部和外部利益相关者对大学演变和变化的影响。书中描述了五代大学:中世纪大学、洪堡大学、公民/土地赠款大学、大众大学和利益相关者大学。这项调查揭示了利益相关者的一些战略转变,因为他们的声音变得越来越突出或已经下降。随着时间的推移,利益相关者的数量不断增加,因为他们的重要性已经通过诸如第三个使命;企业社会责任与螺旋结构而且,尽管一些主要利益相关者(如学习者和教师)保持不变,但他们的影响力有所波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industry and Higher Education
Industry and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Industry and Higher Education focuses on the multifaceted and complex relationships between higher education institutions and business and industry. It looks in detail at the processes and enactments of academia-business cooperation as well as examining the significance of that cooperation in wider contexts, such as regional development, entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems. While emphasizing the practical aspects of academia-business cooperation, IHE also locates practice in theoretical and research contexts, questioning received opinion and developing our understanding of what constitutes truly effective cooperation. Selected key topics Knowledge transfer - processes, mechanisms, successes and failures Research commercialization - from conception to product ''Graduate employability'' - definition, needs and methods Education for entrepreneurship - techniques, measurement and impact The role of the university in economic and social development The third mission and the entrepreneurial university Skills needs and the role of higher education Business-education partnerships for social and economic progress University-industry training and consultancy programmes Innovation networks and their role in furthering university-industry engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信