Effect of Thiamethoxam on Injurious Herbicides in Rice

S. M. Martin, J. Norsworthy, R. Scott, J. Hardke, G. Lorenz, E. Gbur
{"title":"Effect of Thiamethoxam on Injurious Herbicides in Rice","authors":"S. M. Martin, J. Norsworthy, R. Scott, J. Hardke, G. Lorenz, E. Gbur","doi":"10.4172/2329-8863.1000351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increases in the number of herbicide-resistant weeds in rice has led to the need for new herbicides and modes of action to control these troublesome weeds. Previous research has indicated that insecticide seed treatments can safen rice from herbicide drift. In 2014 and 2015, two field experiments were conducted at the Rice Research and Extension Center (RREC) near Stuttgart, Arkansas, and at the University of Arkansas Pine Bluff (UAPB) farm near Lonoke, Arkansas, to determine if insecticide seed treatments could prevent unacceptable levels of herbicide injury from preemergence (PRE)- and postemergence (POST)-applied herbicides that are typically injurious to rice. Both studies were planted with the imidazolinone-resistant, inbred variety CL151. ‘Treated’ plots contained the insecticide seed treatment thiamethoxam while ‘nontreated’ plots contained no insecticide seed treatment. Seven herbicides were evaluated in the PRE experiment: clomazone, pethoxamid, fluridone, S-metolachlor, thiobencarb, clethodim, and quizalofop to determine crop injury, stand counts, groundcover, and rough rice yield with and without an insecticide seed treatment compared to plots with no herbicide treatments. Overall, an insecticide seed treatment provided increased rice stands and less herbicide injury than the ‘nontreated’ seed while increasing yield by 500 kg ha-1. Of the herbicides tested, clomazone-, thiobencarb-, clethodim-, and quizalofop-treated plots had equivalent yields to the no-herbicide plots. The POST experiment evaluated propanil, saflufenacil, carfentrazone, and acifluorfen in various tank-mixtures and application timings. Similar to the PRE experiment, plants from treated seed had less herbicide injury 1 and 5 weeks after treatment (WAT) along with an increased canopy height and groundcover percentage. Plants having treated seed also had increased yields when used with some herbicide programs. Overall, the use of an insecticide seed treatment can give the added benefit of less injury from injurious herbicides as well as increased groundcover.","PeriodicalId":7255,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Crop Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Crop Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increases in the number of herbicide-resistant weeds in rice has led to the need for new herbicides and modes of action to control these troublesome weeds. Previous research has indicated that insecticide seed treatments can safen rice from herbicide drift. In 2014 and 2015, two field experiments were conducted at the Rice Research and Extension Center (RREC) near Stuttgart, Arkansas, and at the University of Arkansas Pine Bluff (UAPB) farm near Lonoke, Arkansas, to determine if insecticide seed treatments could prevent unacceptable levels of herbicide injury from preemergence (PRE)- and postemergence (POST)-applied herbicides that are typically injurious to rice. Both studies were planted with the imidazolinone-resistant, inbred variety CL151. ‘Treated’ plots contained the insecticide seed treatment thiamethoxam while ‘nontreated’ plots contained no insecticide seed treatment. Seven herbicides were evaluated in the PRE experiment: clomazone, pethoxamid, fluridone, S-metolachlor, thiobencarb, clethodim, and quizalofop to determine crop injury, stand counts, groundcover, and rough rice yield with and without an insecticide seed treatment compared to plots with no herbicide treatments. Overall, an insecticide seed treatment provided increased rice stands and less herbicide injury than the ‘nontreated’ seed while increasing yield by 500 kg ha-1. Of the herbicides tested, clomazone-, thiobencarb-, clethodim-, and quizalofop-treated plots had equivalent yields to the no-herbicide plots. The POST experiment evaluated propanil, saflufenacil, carfentrazone, and acifluorfen in various tank-mixtures and application timings. Similar to the PRE experiment, plants from treated seed had less herbicide injury 1 and 5 weeks after treatment (WAT) along with an increased canopy height and groundcover percentage. Plants having treated seed also had increased yields when used with some herbicide programs. Overall, the use of an insecticide seed treatment can give the added benefit of less injury from injurious herbicides as well as increased groundcover.
噻虫嗪对水稻有害除草剂的防治效果
水稻中抗除草剂杂草数量的增加导致需要新的除草剂和行动方式来控制这些麻烦的杂草。以前的研究表明,杀虫剂种子处理可以防止除草剂对水稻的影响。2014年和2015年,在阿肯色州斯图加特附近的水稻研究与推广中心(RREC)和阿肯色州洛诺克附近的阿肯色大学松布拉夫(UAPB)农场进行了两项田间试验,以确定杀虫剂种子处理是否可以防止出苗前(PRE)和出苗后(POST)施用除草剂造成的不可接受水平的除草剂伤害,这些除草剂通常对水稻有害。这两项研究都用抗咪唑啉酮的自交系品种CL151种植。“处理过”的地块含有杀虫剂种子处理剂噻虫嗪,而“未处理”的地块不含杀虫剂种子处理。在PRE试验中评估了七种除草剂:氯马酮、聚噻虫胺、氟立酮、s -甲草胺、硫虫威、氯噻虫胺和quizalofop,以确定与未进行除草剂种子处理的地块相比,有和没有进行杀虫剂种子处理的作物伤害、林分数、地被覆盖和粗粮产量。总体而言,与“未处理”种子相比,杀虫剂种子处理增加了水稻林分,减少了除草剂伤害,同时增加了500 kg ha-1的产量。在所测试的除草剂中,氯虫酮、硫虫威、氯虫啶和喹唑磷处理过的地块与未使用除草剂的地块产量相当。POST实验评估了丙烯、氟苯那西、卡芬曲酮和氟氟芬在不同的罐体混合物和应用时间。与PRE试验相似,处理后1周和5周,处理种子的植株受到的除草剂伤害较少,冠层高度和地被物百分比均有所增加。处理过种子的植物在与某些除草剂一起使用时也增加了产量。总的来说,使用杀虫剂种子处理可以带来额外的好处,减少有害除草剂的伤害以及增加地面覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信