Assessment of standard compliance of Central European plastics-based wall cladding using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)

Daniel Friedrich , Andreas Luible
{"title":"Assessment of standard compliance of Central European plastics-based wall cladding using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)","authors":"Daniel Friedrich ,&nbsp;Andreas Luible","doi":"10.1016/j.csse.2016.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plastics are increasingly combined with renewable fibers to form materials such as wood-plastic composites (WPCs). These bio-based materials have gained the interest of the resource-intensive building industry and are currently used mainly for decking and cladding. Despite their environmental friendliness, WPC façades are still underrepresented in the market. This fact raises the question of whether WPC cladding is currently well positioned in the market and whether its attributes are advertised in a way that makes it stand out in a material selection process. A review of standards and codes relevant to façade design was carried out in this study, which allowed the identification of 21 product attributes as potential deciding factors in cladding product selection. Subsequently, the most promising attributes were used to assess commercially available plastics-based cladding products. By using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) it was found that WPC cladding is still far behind other cladding products with respect to standard compliance but has specific properties which support product optimization. MCDM can be used by WPC cladding manufacturers for strategic product development and by façade designers for material selection processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100222,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csse.2016.03.001","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214399816300029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Plastics are increasingly combined with renewable fibers to form materials such as wood-plastic composites (WPCs). These bio-based materials have gained the interest of the resource-intensive building industry and are currently used mainly for decking and cladding. Despite their environmental friendliness, WPC façades are still underrepresented in the market. This fact raises the question of whether WPC cladding is currently well positioned in the market and whether its attributes are advertised in a way that makes it stand out in a material selection process. A review of standards and codes relevant to façade design was carried out in this study, which allowed the identification of 21 product attributes as potential deciding factors in cladding product selection. Subsequently, the most promising attributes were used to assess commercially available plastics-based cladding products. By using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) it was found that WPC cladding is still far behind other cladding products with respect to standard compliance but has specific properties which support product optimization. MCDM can be used by WPC cladding manufacturers for strategic product development and by façade designers for material selection processes.

使用多准则决策(MCDM)评估中欧塑料墙体覆层的标准符合性
塑料越来越多地与可再生纤维相结合,形成木塑复合材料(wpc)等材料。这些生物基材料已经引起了资源密集型建筑行业的兴趣,目前主要用于装饰和包层。尽管它们对环境友好,但木塑复合材料在市场上的代表性仍然不足。这一事实提出了一个问题,即WPC包层目前是否在市场上定位良好,其属性是否以一种方式宣传,使其在材料选择过程中脱颖而出。在本研究中,对与立面设计相关的标准和规范进行了审查,从而确定了21种产品属性,作为覆层产品选择的潜在决定因素。随后,最有希望的属性被用于评估市售的基于塑料的包层产品。通过使用多准则决策(MCDM),发现WPC包层在标准遵从性方面仍远远落后于其他包层产品,但具有支持产品优化的特定特性。MCDM可以被WPC包层制造商用于战略产品开发,也可以被幕墙设计师用于材料选择过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信