Influence of Agitator Shape on Characteristics and Grinding Efficiency of Attritor Mill

C. Ye, Y. Takaya, Yuki Tsunazawa, K. Mochidzuki, C. Tokoro
{"title":"Influence of Agitator Shape on Characteristics and Grinding Efficiency of Attritor Mill","authors":"C. Ye, Y. Takaya, Yuki Tsunazawa, K. Mochidzuki, C. Tokoro","doi":"10.20965/ijat.2022.p0756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grinding is a unit of operation of a pure mechanical process. An attritor is a grinder able to be used for fine or selective grinding. However, few studies have reported on the optimum design for the attritor. The attritor’s grinding characteristics and grinding effect depend not only on the operating conditions, but also on the geometry of the agitator. Therefore, we investigated the effect of the agitator shape on the grinding efficiency from the viewpoint of experiments, kinetic analysis, and discrete element method (DEM) simulations. We conducted grinding experiments with two different agitators. One was Agitator A, a traditional design with two pairs of 90° staggered mixing arms at the middle and bottom of the mixing shaft. The other was Agitator B, with a lower mixing arm inclined by 10° along the horizontal direction. We found that the grinding rate constant of Agitator B was approximately 40% greater than that of Agitator A. Although the size distribution of the particles was relatively dispersed after grinding with Agitator B, the distribution was concentrated mainly within two ranges (<0.5 mm and 2–4 mm) with Agitator A. These results and an elemental analysis of each size fraction suggested that the dominating grinding mode in Agitator A was surface grinding, whereas in Agitator B, it was bulk grinding. In terms of the influence of the agitator shape, the DEM simulation results showed that the kinetic energy of the grinding media in Agitator B was 0.0046 J/s, i.e., larger than the 0.0035 J/s obtained for Agitator A. A collision energy analysis showed that the dominating collision was between the media and wall in the tangential direction for both models. The collision energy of the media in Agitator B was larger than that of that in Agitator A. The results from the DEM simulation can help us evaluate the experimental results and infer the reasons why the grinding rate constant in Agitator B is larger than that in Agitator A.","PeriodicalId":13583,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Autom. Technol.","volume":"55 5 1","pages":"756-765"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Autom. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2022.p0756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grinding is a unit of operation of a pure mechanical process. An attritor is a grinder able to be used for fine or selective grinding. However, few studies have reported on the optimum design for the attritor. The attritor’s grinding characteristics and grinding effect depend not only on the operating conditions, but also on the geometry of the agitator. Therefore, we investigated the effect of the agitator shape on the grinding efficiency from the viewpoint of experiments, kinetic analysis, and discrete element method (DEM) simulations. We conducted grinding experiments with two different agitators. One was Agitator A, a traditional design with two pairs of 90° staggered mixing arms at the middle and bottom of the mixing shaft. The other was Agitator B, with a lower mixing arm inclined by 10° along the horizontal direction. We found that the grinding rate constant of Agitator B was approximately 40% greater than that of Agitator A. Although the size distribution of the particles was relatively dispersed after grinding with Agitator B, the distribution was concentrated mainly within two ranges (<0.5 mm and 2–4 mm) with Agitator A. These results and an elemental analysis of each size fraction suggested that the dominating grinding mode in Agitator A was surface grinding, whereas in Agitator B, it was bulk grinding. In terms of the influence of the agitator shape, the DEM simulation results showed that the kinetic energy of the grinding media in Agitator B was 0.0046 J/s, i.e., larger than the 0.0035 J/s obtained for Agitator A. A collision energy analysis showed that the dominating collision was between the media and wall in the tangential direction for both models. The collision energy of the media in Agitator B was larger than that of that in Agitator A. The results from the DEM simulation can help us evaluate the experimental results and infer the reasons why the grinding rate constant in Agitator B is larger than that in Agitator A.
搅拌器形状对磨粒机特性及磨粒效率的影响
磨削是一个纯机械过程的操作单元。研磨机是一种研磨机,可用于精细或选择性研磨。然而,关于减速器优化设计的研究报道很少。磨砂器的磨矿特性和磨矿效果不仅与操作条件有关,还与搅拌器的几何形状有关。因此,我们从实验、动力学分析和离散元法(DEM)模拟的角度研究了搅拌器形状对磨矿效率的影响。我们用两种不同的搅拌器进行了研磨实验。一种是搅拌器A,一种传统的设计,在搅拌轴的中间和底部有两对90°交错的搅拌臂。另一种为搅拌器B,其下搅拌臂沿水平方向倾斜10°。我们发现搅拌器B的磨矿速率常数比搅拌器A的磨矿速率常数大40%左右,虽然搅拌器B磨矿后颗粒粒度分布相对分散,但搅拌器A的磨矿粒度分布主要集中在<0.5 mm和2 ~ 4 mm两个范围内。这些结果以及对各个粒度段的元素分析表明,搅拌器A的磨矿方式主要是面磨,而搅拌器B的磨矿方式主要是体磨。对于搅拌器形状的影响,DEM模拟结果表明,搅拌器B中研磨介质的动能为0.0046 J/s,大于搅拌器A的0.0035 J/s。碰撞能量分析表明,两种模型中主要的碰撞是介质与壁面之间的切向碰撞。介质在搅拌器B中的碰撞能量大于在搅拌器A中的碰撞能量。DEM模拟结果可以帮助我们评价实验结果,推断搅拌器B中的研磨速率常数大于搅拌器A的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信