Standards of the European Convention on Human Rights in Admitting Private Video Recordings in Criminal Proceedings

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
De Jure Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.54664/gamw3317
Gergana Ivanova
{"title":"Standards of the European Convention on Human Rights in Admitting Private Video Recordings in Criminal Proceedings","authors":"Gergana Ivanova","doi":"10.54664/gamw3317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is focused on the conflict between private video recordings as evidence in criminal proceedings and the right to privacy within the meaning of Art. 8, para. 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. As regards the scope of the monitoring, the need for a study is due to the lack of uniform standards in the treatment of such records. In this sense, the study of the ECHR’s case law is vital to deriving a catalogue of criteria for their admissibility as evidence in the process and to raising awareness of citizens about the permissible violation of their right not to be monitored without their consent.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/gamw3317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is focused on the conflict between private video recordings as evidence in criminal proceedings and the right to privacy within the meaning of Art. 8, para. 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. As regards the scope of the monitoring, the need for a study is due to the lack of uniform standards in the treatment of such records. In this sense, the study of the ECHR’s case law is vital to deriving a catalogue of criteria for their admissibility as evidence in the process and to raising awareness of citizens about the permissible violation of their right not to be monitored without their consent.
欧洲人权公约在刑事诉讼中承认私人录像的标准
本文的重点是作为刑事诉讼证据的私人录像与第8条第2款意义上的隐私权之间的冲突。《欧洲人权公约》第2条。关于监测的范围,之所以需要进行研究,是因为在处理这类记录方面缺乏统一的标准。从这个意义上说,研究《欧洲人权公约》的判例法对于得出在诉讼过程中可作为证据的可采性标准目录,以及提高公民对未经其同意不受监视的权利被允许受到侵犯的认识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信