Dissolving the Internal-External Divide: Sierra Leone’s Path In and Out of Peacekeeping

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
P. Albrecht, Cathy Haenlein
{"title":"Dissolving the Internal-External Divide: Sierra Leone’s Path In and Out of Peacekeeping","authors":"P. Albrecht, Cathy Haenlein","doi":"10.1080/14678802.2021.1906572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores Sierra Leone’s trajectory from host of the world’s largest peace-support operation to post-conflict provider of peacekeepers elsewhere. Building on the authors’ previous research, it aims to nuance contemporary theoretical discussions of why states contribute peacekeepers, arguing that existing frameworks are unable to fully explain such developments in the Sierra Leonean case. A key reason is that these frameworks principally focus on national-level decision-making, overlooking the influence of foreign governments and external political pressures. Sierra Leone’s contribution of peacekeepers became integral to the post-conflict reconstruction of its armed forces, enabled and pushed forward by external partners, most prominently the UK. As such, internal and external factors intertwined to advance this trajectory, from national identity to income generation, international support and domestic crises. Sierra Leone’s trajectory grew from unique circumstances – with international partners playing an exceptionally central role in driving the process forward. These factors make Sierra Leone an important case to interrogate, against the backdrop of existing theoretical frameworks that seek to explain why states contribute troops.","PeriodicalId":46301,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Security & Development","volume":"29 1","pages":"107 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Security & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.1906572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores Sierra Leone’s trajectory from host of the world’s largest peace-support operation to post-conflict provider of peacekeepers elsewhere. Building on the authors’ previous research, it aims to nuance contemporary theoretical discussions of why states contribute peacekeepers, arguing that existing frameworks are unable to fully explain such developments in the Sierra Leonean case. A key reason is that these frameworks principally focus on national-level decision-making, overlooking the influence of foreign governments and external political pressures. Sierra Leone’s contribution of peacekeepers became integral to the post-conflict reconstruction of its armed forces, enabled and pushed forward by external partners, most prominently the UK. As such, internal and external factors intertwined to advance this trajectory, from national identity to income generation, international support and domestic crises. Sierra Leone’s trajectory grew from unique circumstances – with international partners playing an exceptionally central role in driving the process forward. These factors make Sierra Leone an important case to interrogate, against the backdrop of existing theoretical frameworks that seek to explain why states contribute troops.
消除内外分歧:塞拉利昂的维和之路
本文探讨了塞拉利昂从世界上最大的和平支持行动的东道国到冲突后在其他地方提供维和人员的轨迹。在作者先前研究的基础上,它旨在对当代关于国家为何派遣维和人员的理论讨论进行细微的区分,认为现有的框架无法完全解释塞拉利昂案例中的这种发展。一个关键原因是,这些框架主要侧重于国家一级的决策,忽视了外国政府的影响和外部政治压力。塞拉利昂维和人员的贡献成为冲突后重建其武装部队不可或缺的一部分,这是由外部合作伙伴(最突出的是英国)促成和推动的。因此,从国家认同到创收、国际支持和国内危机,内部和外部因素相互交织,推动了这一轨迹。塞拉利昂的发展轨迹源于独特的环境,国际伙伴在推动这一进程方面发挥了异常重要的作用。这些因素使得塞拉利昂成为一个重要的案例,在现有的理论框架的背景下,试图解释为什么国家派遣军队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict Security & Development
Conflict Security & Development INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信