From the Law of Value Debate to the One-Child Policy in China: On Accounting and Biopolitics

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Malcolm H. Thompson
{"title":"From the Law of Value Debate to the One-Child Policy in China: On Accounting and Biopolitics","authors":"Malcolm H. Thompson","doi":"10.1215/10679847-9417929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues that the origins of the one-child policy beginning in 1980 in China, and its development into the current system of \"comprehensive population management,\" are to be found not in any unfolding of a statist or authoritarian logic, or within the parameters of a nominally \"socialist\" project, but rather in a return to a properly capitalist set of concerns and governmental techniques, the first iteration of which can be traced to the 1920s and 1930s. With regard to the broad set of economic reforms launched in the period 1979–81, it is argued that the one-child policy is absolutely continuous with other reforms across economic sectors (agricultural responsibility systems and urban enterprise reforms) and discontinuous with anything we might understand as population management in the period 1949–76. The \"law of value debate\" in 1979, which \"resolved\" a long-standing set of issues concerning national accounting, planning, and accumulation, is found to be—despite its apparently Marxist character, derivation, and vocabulary—the passage through which a capitalist developmental logic was reintroduced into Chinese governing, with significant consequences.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"58 1","pages":"34 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-9417929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article argues that the origins of the one-child policy beginning in 1980 in China, and its development into the current system of "comprehensive population management," are to be found not in any unfolding of a statist or authoritarian logic, or within the parameters of a nominally "socialist" project, but rather in a return to a properly capitalist set of concerns and governmental techniques, the first iteration of which can be traced to the 1920s and 1930s. With regard to the broad set of economic reforms launched in the period 1979–81, it is argued that the one-child policy is absolutely continuous with other reforms across economic sectors (agricultural responsibility systems and urban enterprise reforms) and discontinuous with anything we might understand as population management in the period 1949–76. The "law of value debate" in 1979, which "resolved" a long-standing set of issues concerning national accounting, planning, and accumulation, is found to be—despite its apparently Marxist character, derivation, and vocabulary—the passage through which a capitalist developmental logic was reintroduced into Chinese governing, with significant consequences.
从价值规律之争到中国的独生子女政策:论会计与生命政治
摘要:本文认为,始于1980年的中国独生子女政策的起源,以及其发展成为当前的“综合人口管理”体系,不是在任何国家主义或威权主义逻辑的展开中,也不是在名义上的“社会主义”项目的参数中,而是在回归到一套适当的资本主义关注和政府技术中,其第一次迭代可以追溯到20世纪20年代和30年代。关于1979年至1981年期间启动的一系列广泛的经济改革,有人认为,独生子女政策与其他经济部门的改革(农业责任制和城市企业改革)是绝对连续的,而与1949年至1976年期间我们可能理解为人口管理的任何改革都是间断的。1979年的“价值规律之争”“解决”了一系列长期存在的关于国民核算、计划和积累的问题,尽管它具有明显的马克思主义特征、来源和词汇,但它被发现是资本主义发展逻辑重新引入中国治理的途径,并产生了重大后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Positions-Asia Critique
Positions-Asia Critique ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信