The Best that I Can Be: A Case for a Strengths-Based Approach during the First‑Year Experience

H. Mason
{"title":"The Best that I Can Be: A Case for a Strengths-Based Approach during the First‑Year Experience","authors":"H. Mason","doi":"10.24085/jsaa.v7i2.3827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More South African research is needed that examines the application of positive psychology to assist students in navigating the stressful first‑year experience by identifying, developing and applying signature strengths. This article reports on a mixed methods study that investigated the efficacy of a strengths-based development programme presented to a sample of 55 first‑year university students (mean age = 19.77, SD = 1.50, female = 60%). Quantitative data were collected in a pre- and post-intervention manner using the Personal Growth Initiative Scale, the Subjective Happiness Scale, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Strengths Use and Deficit Improvement Questionnaire.  Qualitative data were collected in individual semi-structured interviews (n = 12, age range = 18‑22).  Significant changes between the pre- and post‑test scores emerged when comparing the quantitative data. The qualitative analysis pointed to aspects that participants regarded as beneficial to the efficacy of the strengths-based programme. Collectively, the data integration suggested that the intervention had a positive impact on participants’ sense of well‑being and contributed to enhancing the first‑year experience. Limitations and areas for further research conclude the discussion.","PeriodicalId":32008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","volume":"31 1","pages":"89-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v7i2.3827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

More South African research is needed that examines the application of positive psychology to assist students in navigating the stressful first‑year experience by identifying, developing and applying signature strengths. This article reports on a mixed methods study that investigated the efficacy of a strengths-based development programme presented to a sample of 55 first‑year university students (mean age = 19.77, SD = 1.50, female = 60%). Quantitative data were collected in a pre- and post-intervention manner using the Personal Growth Initiative Scale, the Subjective Happiness Scale, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Strengths Use and Deficit Improvement Questionnaire.  Qualitative data were collected in individual semi-structured interviews (n = 12, age range = 18‑22).  Significant changes between the pre- and post‑test scores emerged when comparing the quantitative data. The qualitative analysis pointed to aspects that participants regarded as beneficial to the efficacy of the strengths-based programme. Collectively, the data integration suggested that the intervention had a positive impact on participants’ sense of well‑being and contributed to enhancing the first‑year experience. Limitations and areas for further research conclude the discussion.
我能做到的最好:第一年经验中基于优势方法的案例
南非需要更多的研究来检验积极心理学的应用,通过识别、发展和应用标志性优势来帮助学生度过压力很大的第一年。本文报告了一项混合方法研究,该研究调查了55名大学一年级学生(平均年龄= 19.77,SD = 1.50,女性= 60%)的优势发展计划的有效性。采用个人成长主动性量表、主观幸福感量表、生活满意度量表和优势使用与缺陷改善问卷,在干预前和干预后收集定量数据。定性数据通过个人半结构化访谈收集(n = 12,年龄范围= 18 - 22)。在比较定量数据时,测试前和测试后的分数出现了显著变化。定性分析指出了与会者认为有利于基于优势的方案发挥效力的方面。总的来说,数据整合表明干预对参与者的幸福感有积极的影响,并有助于提高第一年的体验。限制和进一步研究的领域结束了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信