Peripheral blood eosinophil count as a biomarker of exacerbation in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outpatients: a prospective observational study

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
T. Safwat, M. El-Sheikh, Amira El-Sayed, Dalia Abd-Elsattar
{"title":"Peripheral blood eosinophil count as a biomarker of exacerbation in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outpatients: a prospective observational study","authors":"T. Safwat, M. El-Sheikh, Amira El-Sayed, Dalia Abd-Elsattar","doi":"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_120_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Peripheral blood eosinophil count is liable to many factors and has variability over time. There are few studies on the association between the rise of blood eosinophils and the exacerbation incidence in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The association between the rise of blood eosinophils and the rate of exacerbation in stable COPD patients is controversial. Objective To study the relationship between the count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood and the incidence of COPD exacerbation in stable patients. Patients and methods This prospective inquiry was done on 46 patients diagnosed as suffering from stable COPD ‘on the report of the global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guidelines’ attending Ain Shams University hospital outpatient clinic. Results Forty-six stable COPD patients were classified into two groups (groups A and B) based on their median eosinophilic count of ‘250 cell/μl.’ Patients with high eosinophil count ‘group A’ (>250 cell/μl) had a significantly higher incidence of exacerbations (P=0.003), with a relative risk ratio of 2.77, as well as a higher number of exacerbations per patient (two exacerbations/patient) versus one exacerbation/three patients (P<0.001), and a shorter period to the first exacerbation (17 vs. 31 days) (P=0.024), compared with those with low eosinophil count ‘group B (≤250 cell/μl)’ during the study period. On the contrary, there was no significant difference between them in the incidence of pneumonia in relation to inhaled corticosteroid use. Conclusion The count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood is a reliable exacerbation biomarker in stable COPD patients.","PeriodicalId":46359,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_120_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Peripheral blood eosinophil count is liable to many factors and has variability over time. There are few studies on the association between the rise of blood eosinophils and the exacerbation incidence in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The association between the rise of blood eosinophils and the rate of exacerbation in stable COPD patients is controversial. Objective To study the relationship between the count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood and the incidence of COPD exacerbation in stable patients. Patients and methods This prospective inquiry was done on 46 patients diagnosed as suffering from stable COPD ‘on the report of the global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guidelines’ attending Ain Shams University hospital outpatient clinic. Results Forty-six stable COPD patients were classified into two groups (groups A and B) based on their median eosinophilic count of ‘250 cell/μl.’ Patients with high eosinophil count ‘group A’ (>250 cell/μl) had a significantly higher incidence of exacerbations (P=0.003), with a relative risk ratio of 2.77, as well as a higher number of exacerbations per patient (two exacerbations/patient) versus one exacerbation/three patients (P<0.001), and a shorter period to the first exacerbation (17 vs. 31 days) (P=0.024), compared with those with low eosinophil count ‘group B (≤250 cell/μl)’ during the study period. On the contrary, there was no significant difference between them in the incidence of pneumonia in relation to inhaled corticosteroid use. Conclusion The count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood is a reliable exacerbation biomarker in stable COPD patients.
外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数作为稳定型慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者病情恶化的生物标志物:一项前瞻性观察研究
背景:外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数受多种因素影响,且随时间变化。关于稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者血嗜酸性粒细胞升高与急性加重发生率之间关系的研究很少。在稳定期COPD患者中,血嗜酸性粒细胞升高与病情恶化率之间的关系是有争议的。目的探讨稳定期COPD患者外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数与病情恶化的关系。患者和方法这项前瞻性调查是对在艾因沙姆斯大学医院门诊就诊的46名“根据慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)指南报告”诊断为患有稳定型COPD的患者进行的。结果将46例稳定期COPD患者按嗜酸性粒细胞中位数(250 cells /μl)分为A、B两组。A组高嗜酸性粒细胞计数(bb0 250细胞/μl)患者的急性发作发生率显著高于A组(P=0.003),相对风险比为2.77,每位患者的急性发作次数(2次/例)高于1次/ 3例(P<0.001),在研究期间,与嗜酸性粒细胞计数低的B组(≤250细胞/μl)相比,首次急性发作的时间(17天对31天)较短(P=0.024)。相反,在与吸入皮质类固醇使用相关的肺炎发病率方面,他们之间没有显著差异。结论外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数是稳定期COPD患者病情加重的可靠生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis aims to publish and inform readers and all chest physicians of the progress in medical research concerning all aspect of chest diseases. Publications include original articles review articles, editorials, case studies and reports which are relevant to chest diseases. The Journal also aims to highlight recent updates in chest medicine. . Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信