Machine-Learning for the Prediction of Lost Circulation Events - Time Series Analysis and Model Evaluation

A. Magana-Mora, Mohammad Aljubran, J. Ramasamy, M. Albassam, C. Gooneratne, Miguel Gonzalez, Tim Thiel, M. Deffenbaugh
{"title":"Machine-Learning for the Prediction of Lost Circulation Events - Time Series Analysis and Model Evaluation","authors":"A. Magana-Mora, Mohammad Aljubran, J. Ramasamy, M. Albassam, C. Gooneratne, Miguel Gonzalez, Tim Thiel, M. Deffenbaugh","doi":"10.2118/204706-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objective/Scope. Lost circulation events (LCEs) are among the top causes for drilling nonproductive time (NPT). The presence of natural fractures and vugular formations causes loss of drilling fluid circulation. Drilling depleted zones with incorrect mud weights can also lead to drilling induced losses. LCEs can also develop into additional drilling hazards, such as stuck pipe incidents, kicks, and blowouts. An LCE is traditionally diagnosed only when there is a reduction in mud volume in mud pits in the case of moderate losses or reduction of mud column in the annulus in total losses. Using machine learning (ML) for predicting the presence of a loss zone and the estimation of fracture parameters ahead is very beneficial as it can immediately alert the drilling crew in order for them to take the required actions to mitigate or cure LCEs.\n Methods, Procedures, Process. Although different computational methods have been proposed for the prediction of LCEs, there is a need to further improve the models and reduce the number of false alarms. Robust and generalizable ML models require a sufficiently large amount of data that captures the different parameters and scenarios representing an LCE. For this, we derived a framework that automatically searches through historical data, locates LCEs, and extracts the surface drilling and rheology parameters surrounding such events.\n Results, Observations, and Conclusions. We derived different ML models utilizing various algorithms and evaluated them using the data-split technique at the level of wells to find the most suitable model for the prediction of an LCE. From the model comparison, random forest classifier achieved the best results and successfully predicted LCEs before they occurred. The developed LCE model is designed to be implemented in the real-time drilling portal as an aid to the drilling engineers and the rig crew to minimize or avoid NPT.\n Novel/Additive Information. The main contribution of this study is the analysis of real-time surface drilling parameters and sensor data to predict an LCE from a statistically representative number of wells. The large-scale analysis of several wells that appropriately describe the different conditions before an LCE is critical for avoiding model undertraining or lack of model generalization. Finally, we formulated the prediction of LCEs as a time-series problem and considered parameter trends to accurately determine the early signs of LCEs.","PeriodicalId":11094,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204706-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective/Scope. Lost circulation events (LCEs) are among the top causes for drilling nonproductive time (NPT). The presence of natural fractures and vugular formations causes loss of drilling fluid circulation. Drilling depleted zones with incorrect mud weights can also lead to drilling induced losses. LCEs can also develop into additional drilling hazards, such as stuck pipe incidents, kicks, and blowouts. An LCE is traditionally diagnosed only when there is a reduction in mud volume in mud pits in the case of moderate losses or reduction of mud column in the annulus in total losses. Using machine learning (ML) for predicting the presence of a loss zone and the estimation of fracture parameters ahead is very beneficial as it can immediately alert the drilling crew in order for them to take the required actions to mitigate or cure LCEs. Methods, Procedures, Process. Although different computational methods have been proposed for the prediction of LCEs, there is a need to further improve the models and reduce the number of false alarms. Robust and generalizable ML models require a sufficiently large amount of data that captures the different parameters and scenarios representing an LCE. For this, we derived a framework that automatically searches through historical data, locates LCEs, and extracts the surface drilling and rheology parameters surrounding such events. Results, Observations, and Conclusions. We derived different ML models utilizing various algorithms and evaluated them using the data-split technique at the level of wells to find the most suitable model for the prediction of an LCE. From the model comparison, random forest classifier achieved the best results and successfully predicted LCEs before they occurred. The developed LCE model is designed to be implemented in the real-time drilling portal as an aid to the drilling engineers and the rig crew to minimize or avoid NPT. Novel/Additive Information. The main contribution of this study is the analysis of real-time surface drilling parameters and sensor data to predict an LCE from a statistically representative number of wells. The large-scale analysis of several wells that appropriately describe the different conditions before an LCE is critical for avoiding model undertraining or lack of model generalization. Finally, we formulated the prediction of LCEs as a time-series problem and considered parameter trends to accurately determine the early signs of LCEs.
漏失事件预测的机器学习-时间序列分析和模型评估
目的/范围。漏失事故(LCEs)是造成钻井非生产时间(NPT)的主要原因之一。天然裂缝和空穴地层的存在会导致钻井液循环的损失。在泥浆比重不正确的枯竭层钻井也可能导致钻井损失。lce还可能发展为额外的钻井危害,如卡钻事故、井涌和井喷。传统上,只有在中度漏失的情况下,泥浆池中泥浆体积减少,或者环空中泥浆柱减少时,才能诊断出LCE。使用机器学习(ML)来预测漏失区域的存在,并提前估计裂缝参数,这是非常有益的,因为它可以立即提醒钻井队,以便他们采取必要的行动来减轻或治愈lce。方法、程序、过程。虽然已经提出了不同的lce预测计算方法,但还需要进一步改进模型,减少误报的数量。健壮且可泛化的ML模型需要足够多的数据来捕获表示LCE的不同参数和场景。为此,我们开发了一个框架,该框架可以自动搜索历史数据,定位lce,并提取围绕这些事件的地面钻井和流变参数。结果、观察和结论。我们利用各种算法推导出不同的ML模型,并使用井级数据分割技术对其进行评估,以找到最适合LCE预测的模型。从模型比较来看,随机森林分类器取得了最好的结果,在lce发生之前成功地预测了lce。开发的LCE模型可以在实时钻井门户中实施,帮助钻井工程师和钻井队减少或避免NPT。小说/附加信息。本研究的主要贡献是分析实时地面钻井参数和传感器数据,从统计上具有代表性的井数量中预测LCE。在LCE之前,对几口井进行大规模分析,适当地描述不同的条件,对于避免模型训练不足或缺乏模型泛化至关重要。最后,我们将lce的预测表述为一个时间序列问题,并考虑参数趋势,以准确确定lce的早期迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信