Perspective of Construction Building Professionals on Low-Carbon Materials in the Northern Region of Malaysia

IF 0.8 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mohd Omar, A. Ayob, Hafizi Zakaria, N. A. Rahim, Hamizah Mokhtar, Aisyah Ishak, H. Rani, Senja Hernaeni
{"title":"Perspective of Construction Building Professionals on Low-Carbon Materials in the Northern Region of Malaysia","authors":"Mohd Omar, A. Ayob, Hafizi Zakaria, N. A. Rahim, Hamizah Mokhtar, Aisyah Ishak, H. Rani, Senja Hernaeni","doi":"10.21315/jcdc-04-22-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-carbon (LC) materials and alternative technology must frequently overcome various institutional policy and market constraints to gain greater acceptance in the construction sector. The primary impediments that must be addressed in order to build a viable and sustainable local construction sector are awareness and knowledge. To analyse the perspective on LC materials in the northern states of Malaysia, 93 companies were surveyed via their construction building professionals (CBPs) on the awareness, usage frequency, user experience, drivers for material selection, and barriers to LC material adoption in projects. To establish an understanding of CBPs and LC materials, survey data were analysed using semi structured qualitative-quantitative approaches and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, influenced by basic theory. The findings of 79.57% valid responses indicate that the majority of participants had a low degree of awareness, with 95% confidence that there is no difference in the score levels of the overall viewpoints between architects, civil, and structural engineers. Unfired bricks (16.2%) are commonly and widely employed in construction projects, while structural insulated panels (40.9%) are the most favourable LC materials for future projects. Client requirements, regulatory requirements, and expectations of a shorter completion time are the most important factors driving CBPs to select LC materials, accounting for 44.6%, 37.8%, and 37.8%, respectively. According to the CBPs, the main constraint factor to market acceptability is a “lack of sustainable material information” (44.9%). The proposed recommendations include “training on designing a building with LC material,” “clear regulation on limiting carbon emission in a project,” and “increased demonstration of projects and case studies” at a rate ranging from 36.5% to 43.2% to improve client and CBPs acceptance of LC materials for a more sustainable building sector.","PeriodicalId":51876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Construction in Developing Countries","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Construction in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc-04-22-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-carbon (LC) materials and alternative technology must frequently overcome various institutional policy and market constraints to gain greater acceptance in the construction sector. The primary impediments that must be addressed in order to build a viable and sustainable local construction sector are awareness and knowledge. To analyse the perspective on LC materials in the northern states of Malaysia, 93 companies were surveyed via their construction building professionals (CBPs) on the awareness, usage frequency, user experience, drivers for material selection, and barriers to LC material adoption in projects. To establish an understanding of CBPs and LC materials, survey data were analysed using semi structured qualitative-quantitative approaches and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, influenced by basic theory. The findings of 79.57% valid responses indicate that the majority of participants had a low degree of awareness, with 95% confidence that there is no difference in the score levels of the overall viewpoints between architects, civil, and structural engineers. Unfired bricks (16.2%) are commonly and widely employed in construction projects, while structural insulated panels (40.9%) are the most favourable LC materials for future projects. Client requirements, regulatory requirements, and expectations of a shorter completion time are the most important factors driving CBPs to select LC materials, accounting for 44.6%, 37.8%, and 37.8%, respectively. According to the CBPs, the main constraint factor to market acceptability is a “lack of sustainable material information” (44.9%). The proposed recommendations include “training on designing a building with LC material,” “clear regulation on limiting carbon emission in a project,” and “increased demonstration of projects and case studies” at a rate ranging from 36.5% to 43.2% to improve client and CBPs acceptance of LC materials for a more sustainable building sector.
马来西亚北部地区建筑专业人士对低碳材料的看法
低碳(LC)材料和替代技术必须经常克服各种制度政策和市场限制,才能在建筑行业获得更大的接受度。为了建立一个可行和可持续的地方建筑部门,必须解决的主要障碍是认识和知识。为了分析马来西亚北部各州对LC材料的看法,通过他们的建筑专业人员(CBPs)对93家公司进行了调查,内容涉及意识、使用频率、用户体验、材料选择的驱动因素以及项目中LC材料采用的障碍。为了建立对CBPs和LC材料的理解,在基础理论的影响下,使用半结构化定性定量方法和社会科学统计软件包对调查数据进行了分析。79.57%的有效回复结果表明,大多数参与者的意识程度较低,95%的置信度表明建筑师、土木工程师和结构工程师之间的整体观点得分水平没有差异。未烧结砖(16.2%)在建筑项目中广泛使用,而结构隔热板(40.9%)是未来项目中最有利的LC材料。客户需求、监管要求和对更短完成时间的期望是推动cbp选择LC材料的最重要因素,分别占44.6%、37.8%和37.8%。根据CBPs,市场可接受性的主要制约因素是“缺乏可持续的材料信息”(44.9%)。拟议的建议包括“使用LC材料设计建筑的培训”,“明确限制项目碳排放的规定”,以及“增加项目和案例研究的示范”,比例从36.5%到43.2%不等,以提高客户和CBPs对LC材料的接受程度,从而实现更可持续的建筑行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Construction in Developing Countries
Journal of Construction in Developing Countries CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Construction in Developing Countries seeks to provide a central vehicle for the exchange and dissemination of knowledge on issues relevant to the built environment of developing countries. The journal provides a wide range of original research an application papers on current developments and advances in the built environment as well as the economic, social, cultural and technological contexts of developing countries. It also publishes detailed case studies, as well as short communications and discussions. Topics covered include, but are not restricted to planning, urban economics, rural and regional development, housing, management and resource issues, sustiainability, knowledge and technology transfer, construction procurement, facilities management, information an communication technologies, strategies and policy issues, design issues, conservation and environmental issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信