Criminal Liability for Forgery of Print in Polish Legislation

Olivia Rybak-Karkosz
{"title":"Criminal Liability for Forgery of Print in Polish Legislation","authors":"Olivia Rybak-Karkosz","doi":"10.2478/wrlae-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to outline relevant legal problems of domestic legislation in aspects such as evidence difficulties, the so-called legalisation of forgery, and choosing the legal qualification of forgery of print. The doctrine for many years has postulated (and still does) the increase of protection of works of art from crimes such as forgery would increase the safety and fair trade on the art market. However, legislators tend to omit this problem. So, the other possible acts are: the Polish Criminal Code, Act of 23 of July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments, and Act of 16 of April 1993 on Fair Trade. Each of these acts are analysed in the context of its evidential requirements to find the most useful one. The choice of a legal action depends on whether the work of art (print) is considered a monument as in the definition included in the Act on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments. We then compared our results with cases prosecuted in Poland.","PeriodicalId":30439,"journal":{"name":"Wroclaw Review of Law Administration and Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":"77 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wroclaw Review of Law Administration and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to outline relevant legal problems of domestic legislation in aspects such as evidence difficulties, the so-called legalisation of forgery, and choosing the legal qualification of forgery of print. The doctrine for many years has postulated (and still does) the increase of protection of works of art from crimes such as forgery would increase the safety and fair trade on the art market. However, legislators tend to omit this problem. So, the other possible acts are: the Polish Criminal Code, Act of 23 of July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments, and Act of 16 of April 1993 on Fair Trade. Each of these acts are analysed in the context of its evidential requirements to find the most useful one. The choice of a legal action depends on whether the work of art (print) is considered a monument as in the definition included in the Act on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments. We then compared our results with cases prosecuted in Poland.
波兰立法中关于伪造印刷品的刑事责任
摘要本文旨在概述国内立法中存在的相关法律问题,如证据困难、所谓的伪造合法化、伪造印刷品法律资格的选择等。多年来,这一理论一直认为(现在仍然如此),加强对艺术品的保护,使其免受伪造等犯罪行为的侵害,将提高艺术品市场上交易的安全性和公平性。然而,立法者往往忽略了这个问题。因此,其他可能的法案是:波兰刑法,2003年7月23日关于古迹保护和监护的法案,以及1993年4月16日关于公平贸易的法案。这些行为中的每一项都在其证据要求的背景下进行分析,以找出最有用的一项。法律诉讼的选择取决于艺术品(印刷品)是否被视为《古迹保护和监护法》所定义的古迹。然后,我们将结果与波兰起诉的案件进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信