Comparative evaluation of clinical efficiency of different generations of air-polishing powders during professional oral hygiene

L. Orekhova, E. Loboda, I. V. Berezkina, P. A. Boeva, D. V. Rachina
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of clinical efficiency of different generations of air-polishing powders during professional oral hygiene","authors":"L. Orekhova, E. Loboda, I. V. Berezkina, P. A. Boeva, D. V. Rachina","doi":"10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-4-296-302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance . Currently, a preventive system based on organic matter - carbohydrate trehalose has appeared on the dental market. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the need to study its properties and conduct a comparative assessment of different generations of air-polishing powders . The purpose of the study is to conduct a comparative assessment of the clinical efficiency of different generations of air-polishing powders during the professional oral hygiene. Materials and methods. The study involved 38 patients who underwent professional oral hygiene using prophylactic systems of various generations. The oral cavity was preliminarily divided into two sides, depending on the airabrasive agent - based on calcium carbonate (65-70 µm) and trehalose (65 µm). During professional oral hygiene, the time required to remove soft dental deposits was evaluated, and after the procedure, the state of the oral cavity was measured using dental indices. In addition, a questionnaire was used for patients and dentists. Results . The average time for the removal of the soft dental deposits using an air-abrasive agent based on calcium carbonate was 4.5 ± 3.6 min and 4.4 ± 3.8 min based on trehalose. The difference in the average time between the two groups was insignificant (P = 0.461); there was also no significant difference in the average values of the dental indices. The opinion of the dentists and patients about the two preventive systems was comparable. Conclusions . Trehalose-based air-abrasive product is effective, safe, ergonomic and can be recommended for the use of dentists and dental hygienists.","PeriodicalId":19925,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry and dental profilaxis","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry and dental profilaxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2020-20-4-296-302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance . Currently, a preventive system based on organic matter - carbohydrate trehalose has appeared on the dental market. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the need to study its properties and conduct a comparative assessment of different generations of air-polishing powders . The purpose of the study is to conduct a comparative assessment of the clinical efficiency of different generations of air-polishing powders during the professional oral hygiene. Materials and methods. The study involved 38 patients who underwent professional oral hygiene using prophylactic systems of various generations. The oral cavity was preliminarily divided into two sides, depending on the airabrasive agent - based on calcium carbonate (65-70 µm) and trehalose (65 µm). During professional oral hygiene, the time required to remove soft dental deposits was evaluated, and after the procedure, the state of the oral cavity was measured using dental indices. In addition, a questionnaire was used for patients and dentists. Results . The average time for the removal of the soft dental deposits using an air-abrasive agent based on calcium carbonate was 4.5 ± 3.6 min and 4.4 ± 3.8 min based on trehalose. The difference in the average time between the two groups was insignificant (P = 0.461); there was also no significant difference in the average values of the dental indices. The opinion of the dentists and patients about the two preventive systems was comparable. Conclusions . Trehalose-based air-abrasive product is effective, safe, ergonomic and can be recommended for the use of dentists and dental hygienists.
不同代空气抛光粉在专业口腔卫生中的临床效果比较评价
的相关性。目前,一种以有机碳水化合物海藻糖为基础的预防系统已经出现在牙科市场上。研究课题的相关性取决于需要研究其性能并对不同代的空气抛光粉进行比较评估。本研究的目的是对不同代空气抛光粉在专业口腔卫生中的临床效果进行比较评估。材料和方法。该研究涉及38名患者,他们接受了专业口腔卫生治疗,使用了不同世代的预防系统。根据空气磨料的不同,初步将口腔分为两面——碳酸钙(65-70µm)和海藻糖(65µm)。在专业口腔卫生期间,评估去除软牙沉积物所需的时间,并在手术后使用牙科指数测量口腔状态。此外,还对患者和牙医进行了问卷调查。结果。以碳酸钙为基材的空气磨料去除口腔软质沉积物的平均时间为4.5±3.6 min,以海藻糖为基材的平均时间为4.4±3.8 min。两组平均时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.461);两组牙指数平均值差异无统计学意义。牙医和病人对两种预防系统的意见具有可比性。结论。基于海藻糖的空气磨料产品有效,安全,符合人体工程学,可以推荐牙医和牙科保健师使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信