Private Law or Social Norms? The Use of Restrictive Covenants in Beaver Hills

IF 5.2 1区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Yale Law Journal Pub Date : 2007-04-01 DOI:10.2307/20455759
Valerie Jaffee
{"title":"Private Law or Social Norms? The Use of Restrictive Covenants in Beaver Hills","authors":"Valerie Jaffee","doi":"10.2307/20455759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Note provides a detailed history of the use of restrictive covenants in Beaver Hills, a planned residential subdivision built in New Haven between 19o8 and the end of the 1930s. It analyzes these covenants in light of both the relevant common law of servitudes and the contemporary evolution of public land use regulation, most notably zoning. These analyses reveal that restrictive covenants in this era are best understood as a form of signaling and social norms rather than as a form of private law. AUTHOR. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2007; Columbia University, M.A. 2004; Harvard College, B.A. 1999. The author would like to thank Richard Brooks, Robert Ellickson, David Lenzi, and Henry Smith for their invaluable assistance with this Note.","PeriodicalId":48293,"journal":{"name":"Yale Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20455759","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This Note provides a detailed history of the use of restrictive covenants in Beaver Hills, a planned residential subdivision built in New Haven between 19o8 and the end of the 1930s. It analyzes these covenants in light of both the relevant common law of servitudes and the contemporary evolution of public land use regulation, most notably zoning. These analyses reveal that restrictive covenants in this era are best understood as a form of signaling and social norms rather than as a form of private law. AUTHOR. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2007; Columbia University, M.A. 2004; Harvard College, B.A. 1999. The author would like to thank Richard Brooks, Robert Ellickson, David Lenzi, and Henry Smith for their invaluable assistance with this Note.
私法还是社会规范?比弗山限制性契约的使用
本文提供了比弗山限制性契约使用的详细历史,比弗山是1908年至20世纪30年代末在纽黑文建造的一个规划住宅小区。本文将根据相关的普通地役法和公共土地使用监管的当代演变(最显著的是分区)来分析这些契约。这些分析表明,在这个时代,限制性契约最好被理解为一种信号和社会规范的形式,而不是私法的形式。作者。耶鲁大学法学院,法学博士,预计2007年;哥伦比亚大学,硕士,2004;哈佛大学,文学士,1999年。作者要感谢理查德·布鲁克斯、罗伯特·埃里森、大卫·伦齐和亨利·史密斯对本文的宝贵帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Yale Law Journal Online is the online companion to The Yale Law Journal. It replaces The Pocket Part, which was the first such companion to be published by a leading law review. YLJ Online will continue The Pocket Part"s mission of augmenting the scholarship printed in The Yale Law Journal by providing original Essays, legal commentaries, responses to articles printed in the Journal, podcast and iTunes University recordings of various pieces, and other works by both established and emerging academics and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信