The U-Net Family for Epicardial Adipose Tissue Segmentation and Quantification in Low-Dose CT

Lu Liu, R. Ma, P. V. van Ooijen, M. Oudkerk, R. Vliegenthart, Raymond N. J. Veldhuis, C. Brune
{"title":"The U-Net Family for Epicardial Adipose Tissue Segmentation and Quantification in Low-Dose CT","authors":"Lu Liu, R. Ma, P. V. van Ooijen, M. Oudkerk, R. Vliegenthart, Raymond N. J. Veldhuis, C. Brune","doi":"10.3390/technologies11040104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is located between the visceral pericardium and myocardium, and EAT volume is correlated with cardiovascular risk. Nowadays, many deep learning-based automated EAT segmentation and quantification methods in the U-net family have been developed to reduce the workload for radiologists. The automatic assessment of EAT on non-contrast low-dose CT calcium score images poses a greater challenge compared to the automatic assessment on coronary CT angiography, which requires a higher radiation dose to capture the intricate details of the coronary arteries. This study comprehensively examined and evaluated state-of-the-art segmentation methods while outlining future research directions. Our dataset consisted of 154 non-contrast low-dose CT scans from the ROBINSCA study, with two types of labels: (a) region inside the pericardium and (b) pixel-wise EAT labels. We selected four advanced methods from the U-net family: 3D U-net, 3D attention U-net, an extended 3D attention U-net, and U-net++. For evaluation, we performed both four-fold cross-validation and hold-out tests. Agreement between the automatic segmentation/quantification and the manual quantification was evaluated with the Pearson correlation and the Bland–Altman analysis. Generally, the models trained with label type (a) showed better performance compared to models trained with label type (b). The U-net++ model trained with label type (a) showed the best performance for segmentation and quantification. The U-net++ model trained with label type (a) efficiently provided better EAT segmentation results (hold-out test: DCS = 80.18±0.20%, mIoU = 67.13±0.39%, sensitivity = 81.47±0.43%, specificity = 99.64±0.00%, Pearson correlation = 0.9405) and EAT volume compared to the other U-net-based networks and the recent EAT segmentation method. Interestingly, our findings indicate that 3D convolutional neural networks do not consistently outperform 2D networks in EAT segmentation and quantification. Moreover, utilizing labels representing the region inside the pericardium proved advantageous in training more accurate EAT segmentation models. These insights highlight the potential of deep learning-based methods for achieving robust EAT segmentation and quantification outcomes.","PeriodicalId":22341,"journal":{"name":"Technologies","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11040104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is located between the visceral pericardium and myocardium, and EAT volume is correlated with cardiovascular risk. Nowadays, many deep learning-based automated EAT segmentation and quantification methods in the U-net family have been developed to reduce the workload for radiologists. The automatic assessment of EAT on non-contrast low-dose CT calcium score images poses a greater challenge compared to the automatic assessment on coronary CT angiography, which requires a higher radiation dose to capture the intricate details of the coronary arteries. This study comprehensively examined and evaluated state-of-the-art segmentation methods while outlining future research directions. Our dataset consisted of 154 non-contrast low-dose CT scans from the ROBINSCA study, with two types of labels: (a) region inside the pericardium and (b) pixel-wise EAT labels. We selected four advanced methods from the U-net family: 3D U-net, 3D attention U-net, an extended 3D attention U-net, and U-net++. For evaluation, we performed both four-fold cross-validation and hold-out tests. Agreement between the automatic segmentation/quantification and the manual quantification was evaluated with the Pearson correlation and the Bland–Altman analysis. Generally, the models trained with label type (a) showed better performance compared to models trained with label type (b). The U-net++ model trained with label type (a) showed the best performance for segmentation and quantification. The U-net++ model trained with label type (a) efficiently provided better EAT segmentation results (hold-out test: DCS = 80.18±0.20%, mIoU = 67.13±0.39%, sensitivity = 81.47±0.43%, specificity = 99.64±0.00%, Pearson correlation = 0.9405) and EAT volume compared to the other U-net-based networks and the recent EAT segmentation method. Interestingly, our findings indicate that 3D convolutional neural networks do not consistently outperform 2D networks in EAT segmentation and quantification. Moreover, utilizing labels representing the region inside the pericardium proved advantageous in training more accurate EAT segmentation models. These insights highlight the potential of deep learning-based methods for achieving robust EAT segmentation and quantification outcomes.
U-Net家族在低剂量CT心外膜脂肪组织分割和定量中的应用
心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)位于内脏心包和心肌之间,EAT的体积与心血管风险相关。为了减少放射科医生的工作量,在U-net系列中开发了许多基于深度学习的自动EAT分割和量化方法。与冠状动脉CT血管造影的自动评估相比,在非对比低剂量CT钙评分图像上进行EAT的自动评估面临更大的挑战,后者需要更高的辐射剂量来捕捉冠状动脉的复杂细节。本研究全面考察和评估了最先进的分割方法,同时概述了未来的研究方向。我们的数据集包括来自ROBINSCA研究的154个非对比低剂量CT扫描,有两种类型的标签:(a)心包内区域和(b)逐像素的EAT标签。我们从U-net家族中选择了四种先进的方法:3D U-net、3D注意力U-net、扩展的3D注意力U-net和U-net++。为了评估,我们进行了四重交叉验证和保留测试。采用Pearson相关性和Bland-Altman分析对自动分割/量化与人工量化的一致性进行评价。一般来说,使用标签类型(a)训练的模型比使用标签类型(b)训练的模型表现出更好的性能。使用标签类型(a)训练的U-net++模型在分割和量化方面表现出最好的性能。与其他基于U-net的网络和最近的EAT分割方法相比,使用标签类型(a)训练的U-net++模型有效地提供了更好的EAT分割结果(保留测试:DCS = 80.18±0.20%,mIoU = 67.13±0.39%,灵敏度= 81.47±0.43%,特异性= 99.64±0.00%,Pearson相关性= 0.9405)和EAT体积。有趣的是,我们的研究结果表明,3D卷积神经网络在EAT分割和量化方面并不总是优于2D网络。此外,使用代表心包内部区域的标签被证明有利于训练更准确的EAT分割模型。这些见解突出了基于深度学习的方法在实现稳健的EAT分割和量化结果方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信