Notarial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the parties in contracts requiring mandatory notarial form: prospects for development and problems of judicial practice

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
L. Schennikova
{"title":"Notarial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the parties in contracts requiring mandatory notarial form: prospects for development and problems of judicial practice","authors":"L. Schennikova","doi":"10.17223/22253513/44/15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the analysis of contracts that require notarisation. The author focuses on the dynamics of the development of \"cases\" of compulsory notarisation of contracts established by Russian law. Of particular relevance is the analysis of foreign civil legislation stipulating the notarial compulsory form for civil law contracts. The author insists that the purpose of this kind of legislation is to ensure the effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of civil parties. Of particular importance in this regard is the analysis of judicial practice in cases of invalidation of notarized contracts carried out in the study. To develop criteria (grounds, signs) which would allow the legislator to systematically include agreements into the category of mandatory notarization. It is also important to find incentives to exclude cases of judicial invalidation of notarized contracts. The research was carried out using the following methods: general scientific dialectic, universal scientific methods, as well as special legal methods, including comparative legal method, systemic interpretation and legal modelling. It has been proved that the cases of obligatory notarial authentication of contracts in the civil legislation should be based on their basic functions which determine the direction of influence on the participants of proprietary contracts. It was proposed to consider a special object, absence of counteroffer, proprietary law orientation, necessity of protection of family interests, as well as interests of debtor in agreements of security nature as criteria of obligatory notarial authentication of agreements. It has been established that the tendency in the development of civil legislation is an expansion of the list of contracts which require obligatory notarial authentication. It is offered to establish in the norms of notarial law property responsibility of notaries in case of invalidation of agreements certified by them in a judicial proceeding. It is possible to state that the goal of the publication has been reached. A system of criteria for including contracts into a category of obligatory notarial certification is proposed, and also the idea of civil liability of notaries in case of invalidation of contracts certified by them in a court order is formulated. The author declares no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/44/15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the analysis of contracts that require notarisation. The author focuses on the dynamics of the development of "cases" of compulsory notarisation of contracts established by Russian law. Of particular relevance is the analysis of foreign civil legislation stipulating the notarial compulsory form for civil law contracts. The author insists that the purpose of this kind of legislation is to ensure the effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of civil parties. Of particular importance in this regard is the analysis of judicial practice in cases of invalidation of notarized contracts carried out in the study. To develop criteria (grounds, signs) which would allow the legislator to systematically include agreements into the category of mandatory notarization. It is also important to find incentives to exclude cases of judicial invalidation of notarized contracts. The research was carried out using the following methods: general scientific dialectic, universal scientific methods, as well as special legal methods, including comparative legal method, systemic interpretation and legal modelling. It has been proved that the cases of obligatory notarial authentication of contracts in the civil legislation should be based on their basic functions which determine the direction of influence on the participants of proprietary contracts. It was proposed to consider a special object, absence of counteroffer, proprietary law orientation, necessity of protection of family interests, as well as interests of debtor in agreements of security nature as criteria of obligatory notarial authentication of agreements. It has been established that the tendency in the development of civil legislation is an expansion of the list of contracts which require obligatory notarial authentication. It is offered to establish in the norms of notarial law property responsibility of notaries in case of invalidation of agreements certified by them in a judicial proceeding. It is possible to state that the goal of the publication has been reached. A system of criteria for including contracts into a category of obligatory notarial certification is proposed, and also the idea of civil liability of notaries in case of invalidation of contracts certified by them in a court order is formulated. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
公证对合同当事人合法权益的保护需要强制公证的形式:发展前景与司法实践中的问题
本研究的重点是分析需要公证的合同。作者着重讨论了俄罗斯法律规定的合同强制公证“案例”的发展动态。特别值得关注的是国外民事立法对民法合同公证强制形式的规定。笔者认为,这种立法的目的在于确保民事当事人的合法权益得到有效保护。在这方面,特别重要的是对研究中所进行的公证合同无效案件的司法实践分析。制定标准(依据、标志),使立法者能够系统地将协议纳入强制公证的范畴。寻找排除公证合同司法无效案件的激励机制也很重要。研究方法包括一般科学辩证法、普遍科学方法以及比较法、系统解释和法律建模等特殊法律方法。实践证明,民事立法中的合同义务公证认证案件应以合同义务公证的基本功能为依据,这一基本功能决定了合同义务公证对合同参与人的影响方向。有人建议将特殊对象、无还价、专有权法取向、保护家庭利益的必要性以及担保性质协议中债务人的利益作为协议强制公证认证的标准。已经确定的是,民事立法发展的趋势是需要强制公证认证的合同清单的扩大。建议在公证法规范中确立公证员在司法诉讼中所证明的协议无效时的财产责任。可以说出版物的目标已经达到。提出了将合同纳入义务公证的标准体系,并提出了公证员在法院命令中证明的合同无效时承担民事责任的构想。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书