Balancing majoritarianism and the right to consultation: Association of Mineworkers and Constitutional Union and Others v Royal Bafokeng Platinum Limited and Others

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bernard Kengni, Chiyedza Ennah Mutendera
{"title":"Balancing majoritarianism and the right to consultation: Association of Mineworkers and Constitutional Union and Others v Royal Bafokeng Platinum Limited and Others","authors":"Bernard Kengni, Chiyedza Ennah Mutendera","doi":"10.1080/02646811.2021.2012984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case note illustrates how mining companies operating in South Africa often resort to retrenchments to bring operational costs under control. Processes leading to such retrenchments are statutorily required by section 189 of the Labour Relations Act to include consultations, principally with trade unions that are part of collective agreements. As evidenced by the analysis of the Association of Mine Workers and Construction Union and others v Royal Bafokeng Platinum Limited and Others, the said statutory requirement is problematic and divisive as even the Constitutional Court became very divided as to whether the provision regulating retrenchment processes is constitutionally valid. With a slim majority of judges finding the provision constitutional, this case note highlights reasons why such division must be addressed in the interest of affected employees excluded from retrenchment negotiations.","PeriodicalId":51867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2021.2012984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case note illustrates how mining companies operating in South Africa often resort to retrenchments to bring operational costs under control. Processes leading to such retrenchments are statutorily required by section 189 of the Labour Relations Act to include consultations, principally with trade unions that are part of collective agreements. As evidenced by the analysis of the Association of Mine Workers and Construction Union and others v Royal Bafokeng Platinum Limited and Others, the said statutory requirement is problematic and divisive as even the Constitutional Court became very divided as to whether the provision regulating retrenchment processes is constitutionally valid. With a slim majority of judges finding the provision constitutional, this case note highlights reasons why such division must be addressed in the interest of affected employees excluded from retrenchment negotiations.
平衡多数主义和协商权:矿工协会和宪法工会等人诉皇家巴富坑铂金有限公司等人
本案例说明说明在南非经营的矿业公司如何经常采取紧缩措施来控制业务成本。《劳工关系法》第189条在法律上要求在导致这种裁员的过程中包括协商,主要是与作为集体协议一部分的工会进行协商。正如矿工协会和建筑工会及其他人诉皇家巴福肯铂金有限公司及其他人案的分析所证明的那样,上述法定要求是有问题的和有分歧的,因为就连宪法法院也对规定裁员程序的规定是否符合宪法的有效性产生了很大的分歧。以微弱多数的法官认为该条款符合宪法,这一案件说明强调了为什么必须为了被排除在裁员谈判之外的受影响雇员的利益而解决这种分歧的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信