{"title":"Legalità e mutamenti giurisprudenziali nel diritto penale","authors":"A. Galante","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-368-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past several years, constitutional, supreme and human rights courts had to deal with the problem of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law with ever-greater intensity. Following the case Contrada c. Italie, in which the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the legality principle under Art. 7 due to an unforeseeable retrospective application of a judicially created criminal offence, the issue of citizens’ safeguard upon an overruling occurrence is even more in the foreground. What temporal effect is best given to an unfavorable overruling decision? Should its application be limited to acts and conduct occurring after it or should it operate retrospectively and subject to criminal responsibility those who, acting in reliance on an earlier decision, did only what courts declared to be lawful? A limited prohibition of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law seems to help foster an up-to-date relationship between the individual and the state.","PeriodicalId":20330,"journal":{"name":"Premio Tesi di Dottorato","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Premio Tesi di Dottorato","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-368-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Over the past several years, constitutional, supreme and human rights courts had to deal with the problem of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law with ever-greater intensity. Following the case Contrada c. Italie, in which the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the legality principle under Art. 7 due to an unforeseeable retrospective application of a judicially created criminal offence, the issue of citizens’ safeguard upon an overruling occurrence is even more in the foreground. What temporal effect is best given to an unfavorable overruling decision? Should its application be limited to acts and conduct occurring after it or should it operate retrospectively and subject to criminal responsibility those who, acting in reliance on an earlier decision, did only what courts declared to be lawful? A limited prohibition of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law seems to help foster an up-to-date relationship between the individual and the state.
在过去几年中,宪法法院、最高法院和人权法院不得不更加认真地处理刑法中的裁决溯及既往的问题。在Contrada c. italy一案中,欧洲人权法院裁定,由于不可预见地追溯适用司法创造的刑事犯罪而违反了第7条规定的合法性原则,在此之后,公民在被推翻的情况下的保障问题更加突出。什么样的时间效应对一个不利的否决决定是最好的?它的适用是否应限于在它之后发生的行为,或者它是否应追溯地适用,并对那些依靠先前的决定而只做法院宣布为合法的事情的人追究刑事责任?刑法中对判决溯及既往的有限禁止似乎有助于促进个人与国家之间的最新关系。