Is Science Identity a Predictor or an Outcome of Learning Research Skills? Analyses of Evaluation Data from a Training Program to EnhanceResearch Career Preparation of Diverse Undergraduate Students.

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Hiromi Masunaga, Chi-Ah Chun, Kim-Phuong L Vu
{"title":"Is Science Identity a Predictor or an Outcome of Learning Research Skills? Analyses of Evaluation Data from a Training Program to EnhanceResearch Career Preparation of Diverse Undergraduate Students.","authors":"Hiromi Masunaga, Chi-Ah Chun, Kim-Phuong L Vu","doi":"10.46328/ijres.3029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the role of science identity in a two-year upper-division research training program that prepares diverse undergraduate students for a research career. Using the annual year-end student evaluation data, we examined whether science identity is a predictor or an outcome of learning that enhances career preparation in biomedical research. Results showed that science identity is a predictor of learning in our trainees. In general, students with stronger science identity at the end of Year 2 reported having acquired more research skills and experiences through the program. This finding demonstrates that science identity makes learning research skills meaningful and purposeful. Preliminary analyses also showed that the levels of science identity did not differ between Years 1 and 2. In fact, science identity approached the maximum possible scores in both years. These findings imply that the training program could have succeeded in bolstering participants' science identity early by the end of the first year. Our findings do not rule out the possibility that science identity is both a predictor and an outcome of learning, depending on the specific contexts of learning as well as learners' specific developmental phases. Further studies are needed to systematically test these and other possibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13385,"journal":{"name":"Indogermanische Forschungen","volume":"77 1","pages":"266-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indogermanische Forschungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the role of science identity in a two-year upper-division research training program that prepares diverse undergraduate students for a research career. Using the annual year-end student evaluation data, we examined whether science identity is a predictor or an outcome of learning that enhances career preparation in biomedical research. Results showed that science identity is a predictor of learning in our trainees. In general, students with stronger science identity at the end of Year 2 reported having acquired more research skills and experiences through the program. This finding demonstrates that science identity makes learning research skills meaningful and purposeful. Preliminary analyses also showed that the levels of science identity did not differ between Years 1 and 2. In fact, science identity approached the maximum possible scores in both years. These findings imply that the training program could have succeeded in bolstering participants' science identity early by the end of the first year. Our findings do not rule out the possibility that science identity is both a predictor and an outcome of learning, depending on the specific contexts of learning as well as learners' specific developmental phases. Further studies are needed to systematically test these and other possibilities.

科学认同是学习研究技能的预测因素还是结果?对一项旨在加强多元化本科生研究职业准备的培训计划的评估数据进行分析。
本研究考察了科学认同在一个为期两年的高年级研究培训项目中的作用,该项目旨在为不同的本科生从事研究工作做好准备。利用每年年终的学生评估数据,我们研究了科学认同是促进生物医学研究职业准备的学习预测因素还是学习结果。结果表明,科学认同是学员学习的预测因素。一般来说,在第二学年结束时,科学认同感较强的学生表示通过该计划获得了更多的研究技能和经验。这一发现表明,科学认同感使学习研究技能变得有意义、有目的。初步分析还显示,科学认同的水平在一年级和二年级之间没有差异。事实上,在这两年中,科学认同感都接近可能的最高分。这些研究结果表明,培训计划在第一年结束时就已经成功地增强了学员的科学认同感。我们的研究结果并不排除这样一种可能性,即科学认同既是学习的预测因素,也是学习的结果,这取决于学习的具体情境以及学习者的具体发展阶段。还需要进一步的研究来系统地检验这些可能性和其他可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Indogermanische Forschungen publishes contributions (essays and reviews) mainly in the areas of historical-comparative linguistics, historical linguistics, typology and characteristics of the languages of the Indogermanic language family. Essays on general linguistics and non-Indogermanic languages are also featured, provided that they coincide with the main focus of the journal with respect to methods and language history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信