Evaluation of sustainable concrete produced with desalinated reject brine

Kazi P. Fattah, Adil K. Al-Tamimi, Waseem Hamweyah, Fatima Iqbal
{"title":"Evaluation of sustainable concrete produced with desalinated reject brine","authors":"Kazi P. Fattah,&nbsp;Adil K. Al-Tamimi,&nbsp;Waseem Hamweyah,&nbsp;Fatima Iqbal","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The worldwide demand for new concrete buildings is increasing at a rapid pace to keep up with urban development. Despite the need, concrete production and its use have a number of environmental consequences. The production of concrete creates a substantial need for water that directly causes a burden on the already scare natural resource. In United Arab Emirates the majority of the water used for concrete production is obtained through desalination of the seawater. Desalination of seawater produces highly saline wastewater commonly known as reject brine or concentrated brine that has numerous negative environmental effects. The production of cement, the primary ingredient in the production of concrete is responsible for the generation of nearly 5% of the global carbon dioxide that is a potent greenhouse gas.</p><p>With the intent of reducing the carbon footprint of concrete production, a study was carried out to determine the effect of using reject brine as the source of water and the use of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) as a replacement for cement. Concrete samples having three different cement contents were prepared with normal tap water and reject brine. Results showed that the use of GGBS and reject brine improved the strength of concrete produced by 16.5%. Replacing 50% of the cement with GGBS and using reject brine as the source of water has a potential for reducing 176<!--> <!-->kg CO<sub>2</sub> and 1.7–3.4<!--> <!-->kg of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents per one cubic meter of concrete, respectively. The use of the waste reject brine can potentially save USD 170–340 per cubic meter of concrete produced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100716,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.004","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212609015300169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The worldwide demand for new concrete buildings is increasing at a rapid pace to keep up with urban development. Despite the need, concrete production and its use have a number of environmental consequences. The production of concrete creates a substantial need for water that directly causes a burden on the already scare natural resource. In United Arab Emirates the majority of the water used for concrete production is obtained through desalination of the seawater. Desalination of seawater produces highly saline wastewater commonly known as reject brine or concentrated brine that has numerous negative environmental effects. The production of cement, the primary ingredient in the production of concrete is responsible for the generation of nearly 5% of the global carbon dioxide that is a potent greenhouse gas.

With the intent of reducing the carbon footprint of concrete production, a study was carried out to determine the effect of using reject brine as the source of water and the use of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) as a replacement for cement. Concrete samples having three different cement contents were prepared with normal tap water and reject brine. Results showed that the use of GGBS and reject brine improved the strength of concrete produced by 16.5%. Replacing 50% of the cement with GGBS and using reject brine as the source of water has a potential for reducing 176 kg CO2 and 1.7–3.4 kg of CO2 equivalents per one cubic meter of concrete, respectively. The use of the waste reject brine can potentially save USD 170–340 per cubic meter of concrete produced.

用脱盐废盐水生产可持续混凝土的评价
世界范围内对新型混凝土建筑的需求正在快速增长,以跟上城市发展的步伐。尽管有这种需要,但混凝土的生产和使用对环境造成了许多后果。混凝土的生产产生了对水的大量需求,这直接导致了本已稀缺的自然资源的负担。在阿拉伯联合酋长国,用于混凝土生产的大部分水是通过海水淡化获得的。海水淡化产生的高盐废水通常被称为废盐水或浓盐水,对环境有许多负面影响。水泥是生产混凝土的主要成分,其生产过程产生了全球近5%的二氧化碳,而二氧化碳是一种强有力的温室气体。为了减少混凝土生产的碳足迹,进行了以废卤水为水源、以矿渣粉(GGBS)代替水泥的效果研究。用普通自来水和废盐水制备了三种不同水泥含量的混凝土样品。结果表明,掺入GGBS和废盐水后,混凝土强度提高16.5%。用GGBS替代50%的水泥,并使用废弃盐水作为水源,每立方米混凝土可分别减少176千克二氧化碳和1.7-3.4千克二氧化碳当量。使用废弃卤水,每生产立方米混凝土可节省170-340美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信